Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Active Cancer

被引:9
作者
Dafaalla, Mohamed [1 ,10 ]
Abramov, Dmitry [2 ]
Spall, Harriette G. C. Van [3 ]
Ghosh, Arjun K. [4 ,5 ]
Gale, Chris P. [6 ,9 ]
Zaman, Sarah [7 ,8 ]
Rashid, Muhammad
Mamas, Mamas A.
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Ctr Prognosis Res, Keele Cardiovasc Res Grp, Stoke On Trent, England
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Int Heart Inst, Loma Linda, CA USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Heart Ctr, Barts Hlth Natl Hlth Serv Trust, London, England
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, Hatter Cardiovasc Inst, Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, London, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Leeds, England
[7] Westmead Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Westmead Appl Res Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[9] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Keele Univ, Newcastle Under Lyme ST5 5BG, England
关键词
cancer; heart failure readmission; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; RISK; ASCERTAINMENT; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; COHORT; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.10.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Although numerous studies have examined readmission with heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), limited data are available on HF readmission in cancer patients post-AMI. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the rates and factors associated with HF readmission in cancer patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS A nationally linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 were obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project registry and the UK national Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registry. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to evaluate HF readmission at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS A total of 326,551 STEMI indexed admissions were included, with 7,090 (2.2%) patients having active cancer. The cancer group was less likely to be admitted under the care of a cardiologist (74.5% vs 81.9%) and had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs 72.7%; P < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (58.4% vs. 69.5%). There was a significant prescription gap in the administration of post-AMI medications upon discharge such as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (49.5% vs 71.1%) and beta-blockers (58.4% vs 68.0%) in cancer patients. The cancer group had a higher rate of HF readmission at 30 days (3.2% vs 2.3%) and 1 year (9.4% vs 7.3%). However, after adjustment, cancer was not independently associated with HF readmission at 30 days (subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.86-1.28) or 1 year (subdistribution HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.16). The opportunity-based quality indicator was associated with higher rates of HF readmission independent of cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Cancer patients receive care that differs in important ways from patients without cancer. Greater implementation of evidence-based care may reduce HF readmissions, including in cancer patients. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 129
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The Role of Biomarkers in Cardio-Oncology [J].
Ananthan, Kajaluxy ;
Lyon, Alexander R. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (03) :431-450
[2]   Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Fine, Jason P. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (27) :4391-4400
[3]   Linking Heart Failure to Cancer: Background Evidence and Research Perspectives [J].
Bertero, Edoardo ;
Canepa, Marco ;
Maack, Christoph ;
Ameri, Pietro .
CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (07) :735-742
[4]   Acute myocardial infarction treatments and outcomes in 6.5 million patients with a current or historical diagnosis of cancer in the USA [J].
Bharadwaj, Aditya ;
Potts, Jessica ;
Mohamed, Mohamed O. ;
Parwani, Purvi ;
Swamy, Pooja ;
Lopez-Mattei, Juan C. ;
Rashid, Muhammad ;
Kwok, Chun Shing ;
Fischman, David L. ;
Vassiliou, Vassilios S. ;
Freeman, Philip ;
Michos, Erin D. ;
Mamas, Mamas A. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (23) :2183-+
[5]   Determinants and outcomes of coronary angiography after non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A cohort study of the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) [J].
Birkhead, J. S. ;
Weston, C. F. M. ;
Chen, R. .
HEART, 2009, 95 (19) :1593-1599
[6]  
Cancer Research UK, 2015, Cancer incidence for common cancers
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022, Heart disease facts. cdc.gov
[8]   Case-ascertainment of acutemyocardial infarction hospitalizations in cancer patients: a cohort study using English linked electronic health data [J].
Coles, Briana ;
Teece, Lucy ;
Weston, Clive ;
de Belder, Mark A. ;
Oliver-Williams, Clare ;
Welch, Catherine A. ;
Rutherford, Mark J. ;
Lambert, Paul C. ;
Bidulka, Patrick ;
Paley, Lizz ;
Nitsch, Dorothea ;
Deanfield, John ;
Peake, Mick D. ;
Adlam, David ;
Sweeting, Michael J. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2022, 8 (01) :86-95
[9]  
Collet JP, 2021, Eur Heart J, V42, P1289, DOI DOI 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHAA575
[10]   Management of cardiac disease in cancer patients throughout oncological treatment: ESMO consensus recommendations [J].
Curigliano, G. ;
Lenihan, D. ;
Fradley, M. ;
Ganatra, S. ;
Barac, A. ;
Blaes, A. ;
Herrmann, J. ;
Porter, C. ;
Lyon, A. R. ;
Lancellotti, P. ;
Patel, A. ;
DeCara, J. ;
Mitchell, J. ;
Harrison, E. ;
Moslehi, J. ;
Witteles, R. ;
Calabro, M. G. ;
Orecchia, R. ;
de Azambuja, E. ;
Zamorano, J. L. ;
Krone, R. ;
Iakobishvili, Z. ;
Carver, J. ;
Armenian, S. ;
Ky, B. ;
Cardinale, D. ;
Cipolla, C. M. ;
Dent, S. ;
Jordan, K. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) :171-190