Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review

被引:2
作者
Garavito, German Andres Alarcon [1 ]
Moniz, Thomas [1 ]
Mansilla, Cristian [2 ]
Iqbal, Syka [1 ]
Dobrogowska, Rozalia [1 ]
Bennin, Fiona [1 ]
Talwar, Shivangi [1 ,3 ]
Khalid, Ahmad Firas [4 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Targeted Intervent, Rapid Res Evaluat & Appraisal Lab RREAL, London, England
[2] McMaster Univ, McMaster Hlth Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[4] York Univ, Sch Global Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Evidence network; Decision-making; Health policy; Knowledge translation; Knowledge broker; Evidence dissemination; Evidence-informed; PUBLIC-HEALTH; MIXED-METHODS; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; POLICY; COMMUNITIES; RELIABILITY; CHALLENGES; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEvidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.MethodsThe review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.ResultsThe review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.ConclusionsEvidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Appraising the Evidence for Public Health Policy Components Using the Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment [J].
Barbero, Colleen ;
Gilchrist, Siobhan ;
Schooley, Michael W. ;
Chriqui, Jamie F. ;
Luke, Douglas A. ;
Eyler, Amy A. .
GLOBAL HEART, 2015, 10 (01) :3-11
[2]   The CDC Healthy Aging Research Network: advancing science toward action and policy for the evidence-based health promotion movement [J].
Belza, Basia ;
Altpeter, Mary ;
Hooker, Steven P. ;
Moni, Gwen .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 2
[3]   Assessing communities of practice in health policy: a conceptual framework as a first step towards empirical research [J].
Bertone, Maria Paola ;
Meessen, Bruno ;
Clarysse, Guy ;
Hercot, David ;
Kelley, Allison ;
Kafando, Yamba ;
Lange, Isabelle ;
Pfaffmann, Jerome ;
Ridde, Valery ;
Sieleunou, Isidore ;
Witter, Sophie .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 11
[4]   Evaluation of an experiential training program in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research for diverse researcher communities and health care organizations [J].
Buchwald, Dedra S. ;
Rogers, Megan H. ;
Rose, Barbara A. ;
Bresnahan, Brian W. ;
Devine, Beth ;
LeResche, Linda ;
Nelson, Lonnie A. ;
Patrick, Donald L. ;
Lavallee, Danielle C. ;
Garrison, Michelle M. ;
White, Andrew A. ;
Kessler, Larry G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
[5]   The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy [J].
Cacari-Stone, Lisa ;
Wallerstein, Nina ;
Garcia, Analilia P. ;
Minkler, Meredith .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (09) :1615-1623
[6]  
Caribbean Health Research Council, 2008, Translating health research to action: a toolkit for the Caribbean
[7]   Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes® [J].
Chinman, Matthew ;
Acosta, Joie ;
Ebener, Patricia ;
Malone, Patrick S. ;
Slaughter, Mary E. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
[8]   Tapping into the power of coproduction and knowledge mobilisation: Exploration of a facilitated interactive group learning approach to support equity-sensitive decision-making in local health and care services [J].
Cloke, Jane ;
Hassan, Shaima ;
Goodall, Mark ;
Ring, Adele ;
Saini, Pooja ;
Tahir, Naheed ;
Gabbay, Mark .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (04) :1692-1702
[9]   Incorporating sex, gender and vulnerable populations in a large multisite health research programme: The Ontario Pharmacy Evidence Network as a case study [J].
Cooke, Martin ;
Waite, Nancy ;
Cook, Katie ;
Milne, Emily ;
Chang, Feng ;
McCarthy, Lisa ;
Sproule, Beth .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 15
[10]   The Indigenous primary health care and policy research network: Guiding innovation within primary health care with Indigenous peoples in Alberta [J].
Crowshoe, Lynden ;
Sehgal, Anika ;
Montesanti, Stephanie ;
Barnabe, Cheryl ;
Kennedy, Andrea ;
Murry, Adam ;
Roach, Pamela ;
Green, Michael ;
Bablitz, Cara ;
Tailfeathers, Esther ;
Henderson, Rita .
HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 125 (06) :725-731