White meat consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Ramel, Alfons [1 ]
Nwaru, Bright, I [2 ]
Lamberg-Allardt, Christel [3 ]
Thorisdottir, Birna [4 ]
Barebring, Linnea [5 ]
Soderlund, Fredrik [6 ]
Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer [7 ]
Dierkes, Jutta [8 ,9 ]
Akesson, Agneta [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Food Sci & Nutr, Aragata 14, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Krefting Res Ctr, Inst Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Food & Nutr, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Iceland, Hlth Sci Inst, Reykjavik, Iceland
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Med, Dept Internal Med & Clin Nutr, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Cardiovasc & Nutr Epidemiol, Solna, Sweden
[7] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Nutr, Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Bergen, Ctr Nutr, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway
[9] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Bergen, Norway
关键词
white meat; meta analysis; systema'c review; cardiovascular disease; type; 2; diabetes; Nordic Nutri*on; Recommenda*ons; DIETARY-PROTEIN SOURCES; CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY; RED MEAT; PROCESSED MEAT; HEART-DISEASE; LIPID PROFILE; STROKE; BEEF; MEN; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.29219/fnr.v67.9543
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim was to systematically review the associations among white meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus were searched (15th October 2021) for randomized intervention trials (RCTs, >= 4 weeks of duration) and prospective cohort studies (>= 12 month of follow-up) assessing the consumption of white meat as the intervention/ exposure. Eligible outcomes for RCTs were cardiometabolic risk factors and for cohorts, fatal and non-fatal CVD and incident T2D. Risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane's RoB2 and Risk of Bias for Nutrition Observational Studies. Meta-analysis was conducted in case of >= 3 relevant intervention studies or >= 5 cohort studies using random-effects models. The strength of evidence was evaluated using the World Cancer Research Fund's criteria. Results: The literature search yielded 5,795 scientific articles, and after screening 43 full-text articles, 23 cohort studies and three intervention studies were included. All included intervention studies matched fat content of intervention and control diets, and none of them showed any significant effects on the selected outcomes of white meat when compared to red meat. Findings from the cohort studies generally did not support any associations between white meat intake and outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted for CVD mortality (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87-1.02, P = 0.23, I-2 = 25%) and T2D incidence (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.87-1.11, P = 0.81, I-2 = 82%). Conclusion: The currently available evidence does not indicate a role, beneficial or detrimental, of white meat consumption for CVD and T2D. Future studies investigating potentially different health effects of processed versus unprocessed white meat and substitution of red meat with white meat are warranted. Registration: Prospero registration CRD42022295915.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews
  • [2] The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022-handbook for qualified systematic reviews
    Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer
    Christensen, Jacob Juel
    Andersen, Rikke
    Eneroth, Hanna
    Erkkola, Maijaliisa
    Hoyer, Anne
    Lemming, Eva Warensjo
    Meltzer, Helle Margrete
    Halldorsson, Porhallur Ingi
    Porsdottir, Inga
    Schwab, Ursula
    Trolle, Ellen
    Blomhoff, Rune
    [J]. FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2020, 64 : 1 - 15
  • [3] The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022-structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews
    Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer
    Christensen, Jacob Juel
    Andersen, Rikke
    Eneroth, Hanna
    Erkkola, Maijaliisa
    Hoyer, Anne
    Lemming, Eva Warensjo
    Meltzer, Helle Margrete
    Halldorsson, Porhallur Ingi
    Porsdottit, Inga
    Schwab, Ursula
    Trolle, Ellen
    Blomhoff, Rune
    [J]. FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2020, 64 : 1 - 11
  • [4] Plasma lipids and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men fed a lipid-lowering diet containing lean beef, lean fish, or poultry
    Beauchesne-Rondeau, É
    Gascon, A
    Bergeron, J
    Jacques, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2003, 77 (03) : 587 - 593
  • [5] Effects of red meat, white meat, and nonmeat protein sources on atherogenic lipoprotein measures in the context of low compared with high saturated fat intake: a randomized controlled trial
    Bergeron, Nathalie
    Chiu, Sally
    Williams, Paul T.
    King, Sarah M.
    Krauss, Ronald M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 110 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [6] Nitrate Is Nitrate: The Status Quo of Using Nitrate through Vegetable Extracts in Meat Products
    Bernardo, Patricia
    Patarata, Luis
    Lorenzo, Jose M.
    Fraqueza, Maria Joao
    [J]. FOODS, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [7] Dietary Protein Sources and the Risk of Stroke in Men and Women
    Bernstein, Adam M.
    Pan, An
    Rexrode, Kathryn M.
    Stampfer, Meir
    Hu, Frank B.
    Mozaffarian, Dariush
    Willett, Walter C.
    [J]. STROKE, 2012, 43 (03) : 637 - +
  • [8] Major Dietary Protein Sources and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Women
    Bernstein, Adam M.
    Sun, Qi
    Hu, Frank B.
    Stampfer, Meir J.
    Manson, JoAnn E.
    Willett, Walter C.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (09) : 876 - 883
  • [9] The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022-principles and methodologies
    Christensen, Jacob Juel
    Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer
    Andersen, Rikke
    Eneroth, Hanna
    Erkkola, Maijaliisa
    Hoyer, Anne
    Lemming, Eva Warensjo
    Meltzer, Helle Margrete
    Halldorsson, Thhallur Ingi
    Thorsdottir, Inga
    Schwab, Ursula
    Trolle, Ellen
    Blomhoff, Rune
    [J]. FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2020, 64 : 1 - 15
  • [10] Clinical Calculators, Odds Ratio to Risk Ratio