What constitutes food system resilience? The importance of divergent framings between UK mainstream and local food system actors

被引:2
作者
Black, Jasmine Elizabeth [1 ]
Maye, Damian [2 ]
Krzywoszynska, Anna [3 ]
Jones, Stephen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Future Initiat, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Gloucestershire, Countryside & Community Res Inst, Cheltenham, England
[3] Univ Oulu, Oulu, Finland
[4] Nat England, York, England
来源
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | 2024年 / 126卷 / 13期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Covid-19; UK food system; Food policy; Alternative food networks; Local food system; Framing theory and discourse analysis; SECURITY; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1108/BFJ-10-2022-0928
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper examines how key actors in the UK food system (FS) understand the role of the local food sector in relation to FS resilience.Design/methodology/approachDiscourse analysis was used to assess and compare the framings of the UK FS in 36 publications released during Covid-19 from alternative food networks (AFNs) actors and from other more mainstream FS actors, including the UK government.FindingsThe analysis shows that AFNs actors perceive the UK FS as not resilient and identify local FSs as a route towards greater resilience ("systemic" framing). In contrast, other food actors perceive the UK FS as already resilient, with the role of local food limited to specific functions within the existing system ("add-on" framing). The two groups converge on the importance of dynamic public procurement and local abattoir provision, but this convergence does not undermine the fundamental divergence in the understanding of the role of "the local" in resilient UK FSs. The local food sector's messages appear to have gone largely unheard in mainstream policy.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper presents an analysis of public sector reports focused on the UK FS released during the Covid-19 pandemic years 2020-2021. The corpus inclusion criteria mean that publications during this period which focus on other food sector issues, such social injustices, climate change and health, were not included in the analysis, although they may have touched upon local food issues. The authors further recognise that Covid-19 had a longer lasting effect on FSs than the years 2020-2021, and that many other publications on FSs have been published since. The time span chosen targets the time at which FSs were most disrupted and therefore aims to capture emerging issues and solutions for the UK FS. The authors' insights should be further validated through a more complete review of both public reports and academic papers covering a wider base of food-related issues and sectors as well as a broader timespan.Originality/valueA comparison of how different FS actors understand the importance of local food, especially in relation to resilience, has not been undertaken to date. The findings raise important questions about the disconnect between AFN actors and other actors in the framing of resilience. Considering the need to ensure resilience of the UK FS, this study's findings raise important insights for UK food policy about the "local food blindspot" and for food movement actors wishing to progress their vision of transformative change.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 71
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [51] POST, 2020, A resilient UK food system
  • [52] SCAR Expert Group, 2020, Resilience and transformation Report of the 5th SCAR Foresight Exercise Expert Group Natural resources and food systems: transitions towards a 'safe and just' operating space
  • [53] Diverse adaptation strategies helped local food producers cope with initial challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic: Lessons from Quebec, Canada
    Schreiber, Kerstin
    Soubry, Bernard
    Dove-McFalls, Carley
    MacDonald, Graham K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2022, 90 : 124 - 133
  • [54] Simanskien L., 2022, Palgrave Studies of Cross-Disciplinary Business Research, in Association with EuroMed Academy of Business, P281, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-76583-5_12/COVER
  • [55] Soil Association, 2020, Shortening supply chains - roads to regional resilience
  • [56] Soil Association, 2020, Response to Covid-19 and food supply chain inquiry
  • [57] Soil Association, 2020, Response to public procurement inquiry
  • [58] Soil Association, 2020, Grow back better - a resilience route-map for post-Covid-19 food, farming and land-use
  • [59] A resilient social economy? Insights from the community food sector in the UK
    Sonnino, Roberta
    Griggs-Trevarthen, Christopher
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 25 (3-4) : 272 - 292
  • [60] Sustain, 2020, Sustain response to the EFRA inquiry on food supply during the Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic, executive summary