Lean-circular maturity model (LCMM) for companies' self-assessment in terms of process, product and life cycle thinking

被引:3
作者
de Paula e Silva, Marina Hernandes [1 ]
Mergulha, Ricardo Coser [2 ]
Vieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal [2 ]
Pampanelli, Andrea Brasco [3 ]
Salvador, Rodrigo [4 ]
Silva, Diogo Aparecido Lopes [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Prod Engn, Res Grp Sustainabil Engn, Engs Grp, Fed Univ Sao Carlos UFSCar, Joao dos Leme St Rd km 110, Sorocaba, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Sao Carlos UFSCar, Dept Prod Engn, Joao dos Leme St Rd km 110, Sorocaba, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Rio Grande UFRGS, Ave Bento Goncalves 9500, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[4] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Engn Technol & Didact, Lautrupvang 15,Bldg Ballerup Room E2 12, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark
关键词
Lean management; Cradle-to-cradle; Sustainability; Maturity level; Circularity; GREEN; EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2023.11.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapidly diagnosing the status of resource efficiency and waste generation throughout the entire value chain is considered one of the key future advancements towards achieving more sustainable production. This study aimed to develop and implement a self-assessment tool to assist companies in decision-making processes for establishing circular flows based on the principles of Lean Manufacturing (LM) and Circular Economy (CE). The selfassessment tool employed a maturity model comprising several stages, which were designed through a combination of design science research and scenario planning. The Lean-Circular Maturity Model (LCMM) consisted of maturity levels ranging from 0 to 4, assessing strategies such as Resource Efficiency, Energy Management, Water and Wastewater Management, Materials and Solid Waste Management, and Chemicals and Emissions Management. The model was applied to nine companies varying in sector, size, region, and nationality. Their engagement in LM, and CE, differed, as did their strategy maturity metrics. Primary sector companies showed higher maturity in water-waste and chemical-emissions management. Larger enterprises focused on these strategies, with nuances based on region. The main findings indicated that 66% of the companies sought cleaner alternatives prior to mapping their production processes, which could lead to errors in planning and prioritizing improvement actions. Furthermore, 61% of the companies lacked sufficient training and employee awareness regarding the efficient utilization of resources. The absence of comprehensive actions to manage the life cycle of products throughout the value chain emerged as the primary barrier identified. To address these gaps, the LCMM offers a set of tailored recommendations for each company to enhance processes, products, and the value chain based on the final score obtained from utilizing the LCMM self-assessment tool.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 183
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circular product design maturity matrix: A guideline to evaluate new product development in light of the circular economy transition
    Aguiar, Marina Fernandes
    Jugend, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [2] Arekrans J., 22 CINET C 2021 ORG
  • [3] Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chains
    Asdecker, Bjoern
    Felch, Vanessa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2018, 13 (04) : 840 - 883
  • [4] A simulation-based methodology for the analysis of the effect of lean tools on energy efficiency: An application in power distribution industry
    Baysan, Serdar
    Kabadurmus, Ozgur
    Cevikcan, Emre
    Satoglu, Sule Itir
    Durmusoglu, Mehmet Bulent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 895 - 908
  • [5] CE-oriented culture readiness: An assessment approach based on maturity models and fuzzy set theories
    Bertassini, Ana Carolina
    Calache, Lucas Daniel Del Rosso
    Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    Gerolamo, Mateus Cecilio
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 31 : 9 - 15
  • [6] beth M., 2011, CMMI for development: guidelines for process integration and product improvement
  • [7] Supply chain collaboration: differing perspectives of Brazilian companies
    Carvalho, Nayara Louise
    Mendes, Juliana Veiga
    Akim, Erica Kushihara
    Mergulhao, Ricardo Coser
    Vidal Vieira, Jose Geraldo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (01) : 120 - 137
  • [8] A supply chain risk management maturity model and a multi-criteria classification approach
    Cavalcante de Souza Feitosa, Ingrid Saiala
    Ribeiro Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar
    de Almeida-Filho, Adiel Teixeira
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (09) : 2636 - 2655
  • [9] A readiness self-assessment model for implementing green lean initiatives
    Cherrafi, Anass
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    Belhadi, Amine
    Kamble, Sachin S.
    Elbaz, Jamal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 309
  • [10] Lean Maturity Assessment in ETO Scenario
    Chiera, Mariastella
    Lupi, Francesco
    Rossi, Andrea
    Lanzetta, Michele
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09):