Outcomes for children with disability in out-of-home care: Evidence from the pathways of care longitudinal study in Australia

被引:4
作者
Cheng, Zhiming [1 ,2 ]
Tani, Massimiliano [3 ]
Katz, Ilan [2 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Business Sch, Dept Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Social Policy Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Business, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Children with disability; Out-of-home care; Wellbeing; FOSTER-CARE; DISABLED-CHILDREN; YOUNG-PEOPLE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106246
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Background: Children with disability are over-represented in out-of-home care (OOHC) in Australia and internationally. Yet we know little about their circumstances, placement types, support needs, and the outcomes of their trajectories and wellbeing through care. Objective: We examine the wellbeing and outcomes of children with and without disabilities in OOHC. Participants and setting: We use panel data from waves 1-4 of the Pathways of Care Longitudinal Study (POCLS) collected between June 2011 and November 2018 by the New South Wales (NSW) Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ), Australia. The POCLS sampling framework covers all children aged 0-17 years who entered OOHC in NSW for the first time between May 2010 and October 2011 (n = 4126). A subset of these children (n = 2828) had final Children's Court orders by 30 April 2013. Among these, caregivers of 1789 children agreed to participate in the interview component of the POCLS. Methods: We employ a random effects estimator to analyse the panel data. This is standard practice to exploit a panel database when some of the key explanatory variables are time invariant. Results: Children with disability have poorer wellbeing than children without disability across the three domains of physical health, socio-emotional wellbeing, and cognitive ability. However, children with disability have fewer difficulties at school and better school bonding. The type of placements - namely relative/kinship care, restoration/adoption/guardianship, foster care and residential care - have little or limited association with wellbeing of children with disability. Conclusions: Children with disability tend to have lower levels of wellbeing in OOHC than children without disability, and this is driven mainly by their disability status rather than care factors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Achenbach T.M., 2000, Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles
  • [2] Achenbach T. M., 2001, Manual for the ASEBA SchoolAge Forms and Profiles
  • [3] Angold A, 1995, INT J METHOD PSYCH, V5, P237
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, PERMANENCE STABILITY
  • [5] Asif N., 2023, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT
  • [6] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2021, CHILD PROT AUSTR 202
  • [7] Reaching everyone: Promoting the inclusion of youth with disabilities in evaluating foster care outcomes
    Blakeslee, Jennifer E.
    Del Quest, A.
    Powers, Jennifer
    Powers, Laurie E.
    Geenen, Sarah
    Nelson, May
    Dalton, Lawrence D.
    McHugh, Elizabeth
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2013, 35 (11) : 1801 - 1808
  • [8] Commonwealth of Australia, 2021, Australias disability strategy 20212031
  • [9] Create Foundation, 2012, SUPP CHILDR YOUNG PE, P1
  • [10] Degener T., 2017, UN C RIGHTS PERSONS, P41, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3_2