Applying multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritise age-friendly criteria for policy implications

被引:1
|
作者
Raut, Sashi Bhusan [1 ]
机构
[1] ABIT Grp Inst, Piloo Mody Coll Architecture, Cuttack, Odisha, India
关键词
Policy; enhancement; safety; assessment; age-friendliness; SAMPLE-SIZE; PILOT SAMPLE; COMMUNITIES; CITIES;
D O I
10.1080/19463138.2023.2228736
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Significant increase in the proportion of elderly and its expected further increase in the days to come draw attention of policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to enhance a community's age-friendliness. Enhancement of a community's age-friendliness requires appropriate policy implications recommended by various stakeholders based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) followed by Friedman's rank test. Results showed that 'safety and security' has the highest priority amongst all the criteria considered for the assessment of age-friendliness. Based on Friedman's rank test, community boundary with security check posts has the highest priority to increase safety and security of the community. A combination of policy measures having higher priority such as 'police patrolling', 'mixed land-use urban planning', and 'accessibility to services' could be the effective solution to increase safety and security of the community environment and foster independent living ability of its residents which in turn play important role in increasing age-friendliness of the community.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 266
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [22] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [23] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [24] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [25] Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: The TODIM method with criteria interactions
    Gomes L.F.A.M.
    Machado M.A.S.
    Rangel L.A.D.
    Annals of Operations Research, 2013, 211 (1) : 531 - 548
  • [26] EMPLOYING CARDINAL RANK ORDERING OF CRITERIA IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Riabacke, Mona
    Danielson, Mats
    Larsson, Aron
    Ekenberg, Love
    UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 76 - 82
  • [27] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Thokala, Praveen
    Madhavan, Guruprasad
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [28] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226
  • [29] Stochastic Approaches for Criteria Weight Identification in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Paradowski, Bartosz
    Shekhovtsov, Andrii
    Watrobski, Jaroslaw
    Salabun, Wojciech
    INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, PT I, ACIIDS 2024, 2024, 14795 : 40 - 51
  • [30] Optimizing Decisional Process by Applying the Multi-criteria Analysis
    Fechete, Flavia
    Nedelcu, Anisor
    ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN MANUFACTURING, 2014, 657 : 926 - 930