A dual-frame approach for estimation with respondent-driven samples

被引:1
作者
Huang, Chien-Min [1 ]
Breidt, F. Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Stat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Stat & Data Sci, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
来源
METRON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STATISTICS | 2023年 / 81卷 / 01期
关键词
Inverse propensity estimator; Network sampling; Nonprobability sample; Project; 90; NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES; PROBABILITY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40300-023-00241-8
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an increasingly common method for surveying rare, hidden, or otherwise hard-to-reach populations. Instead of formal probability sampling from a well-defined frame, RDS relies on respondents themselves to recruit additional participants through their own social networks. By necessity, RDS is often initiated with a small, non-random sample. Standard RDS estimators have been developed under strong assumptions on the diffusion of sampling through the network over multiple waves of recruitment. We consider an alternative setting in which these assumptions are not met, and instead a large probability sample is used to initiate RDS and only a few waves of recruitment take place. In this setting, we develop dual-frame estimators that use both known inclusion probabilities from the initial sampling design and estimated inclusion probabilities from RDS, treated as a nonprobability sample. In a simulation study using network data from the Project 90 study, our dual-frame estimators perform well relative to standard RDS alternatives, across a wide range of recruitment behaviors. We propose a simple variance estimator that yields stable estimates and reasonable confidence interval coverage. Finally, we apply our dual-frame estimators to a real RDS study of smoking behavior among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Estimating uncertainty in respondent-driven sampling using a tree bootstrap method
    Baraff, Aaron J.
    McCormick, Tyler H.
    Raftery, Adrian E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (51) : 14668 - 14673
  • [2] Doubly Robust Inference With Nonprobability Survey Samples
    Chen, Yilin
    Li, Pengfei
    Wu, Changbao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (532) : 2011 - 2021
  • [3] Inference for Nonprobability Samples
    Elliott, Michael R.
    Valliant, Richard
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 32 (02) : 249 - 264
  • [4] Respondent-driven sampling and the homophily configuration graph
    Fellows, Ian E.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (01) : 131 - 150
  • [5] Ganesh N., 2017, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, P1657
  • [6] Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation
    Gile, Krista J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (493) : 135 - 146
  • [7] RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING: AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT METHODOLOGY
    Gile, Krista J.
    Handcock, Mark S.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 40, 2010, 40 : 285 - 327
  • [8] Assessing respondent-driven sampling
    Goel, Sharad
    Salganik, Matthew J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (15) : 6743 - 6747
  • [9] Hajek J., 1971, FDN STAT INFERENCE, P236
  • [10] On the theory of sampling from finite populations
    Hansen, MH
    Hurwitz, WN
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1943, 14 : 333 - 362