共 50 条
Intersectional perspectives on the employment rate in Supported Employment for people with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities: A scoping review
被引:4
|作者:
Witte, Ingrid
[1
,3
]
Strandberg, Thomas
[2
,3
,4
]
Granberg, Sarah
[1
,3
,5
]
Gustafsson, Johanna
[1
,3
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Orebro Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Orebro, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ, Sch Law Psychol & Social Work, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Orebro Univ, Swedish Inst Disabil Res, Orebro, Sweden
[4] Dalarna Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Falun, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Audiol Res Ctr, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Ctr Study Profess, Oslo, Norway
来源:
基金:
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词:
Employment;
Supported;
disabilities;
mental disorders;
intersectionality;
vocational rehabilitation;
SEVERE MENTAL-ILLNESS;
INDIVIDUAL PLACEMENT;
WORK OUTCOMES;
PREDICTORS;
SERVICES;
IMPLEMENTATION;
CLIENT;
SCHIZOPHRENIA;
METAANALYSIS;
DISORDERS;
D O I:
10.3233/WOR-211155
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Supported Employment (SE) has shown better results in the employment rate for persons with disabilities than other methods within vocational rehabilitation, but howSE affects the employment rate for subgroups in the interventions needs further attention. OBJECTIVE: To examine previous research regarding the influence of intersecting statuses on the employment rate in SE for people with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities according to type of diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, age, level of education and previous work history. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in nine databases including peer-reviewed articles from 2000 to April 2021. Articles presenting the employment rate in SE interventions according to the intersecting statuses listed in the objective were included. RESULTS: The searches identified 3777 unique records, of which 53 articles were included in data extraction. In most of the included articles, intersecting statuses did not affect the employment rate for people in the SE interventions with psychiatric disabilities. Few studies have examined neuropsychiatric and intellectual disabilities. A majority of the studies subjected to full-text analysis were excluded due to a lack of reporting of the effects of intersecting statuses on the employment rate. The studies that reported on the effects of intersecting statuses on the employment rate often had small samples and lacked statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Intersecting statuses do not appear to affect the employment rate for people receiving SE interventions, but systematic reviews with pooled samples need to be undertaken because of the low reporting rate and underpowered sample sizes in existing studies.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 454
页数:20
相关论文