Socially assistive robots in health and social care: Acceptance and cultural factors. Results from an exploratory international online survey

被引：12

作者：

Papadopoulos, Irena ^{[1
]}

Wright, Steve ^{[2
]}

Koulouglioti, Christina ^{[3
]}

Ali, Sheila ^{[4
]}

Lazzarino, Runa ^{[4
]}

Martin-Garcia, Angel ^{[5
]}

Oter-Quintana, Cristina ^{[6
]}

Kouta, Christiana ^{[7
]}

Rousou, Elena ^{[7
]}

Papp, Katalin ^{[8
]}

Krepinska, Radka ^{[9
]}

Tothova, Valerie ^{[10
]}

Malliarou, Maria ^{[11
]}

Apostolara, Paraskevi ^{[12
]}

Lesinska-Sawicka, Malgorzata ^{[13
]}

Nagorska, Malgorzata ^{[14
]}

Liskova, Miroslava ^{[15
]}

Nortvedt, Line ^{[16
]}

Alpers, Lise-Merete ^{[17
]}

Biglete-Pangilinan, Sylvia ^{[18
]}

Oconer-Rubiano, Ma. Florinda ^{[19
]}

Chaisetsampun, Wireeporn ^{[20
]}

Wichit, Nutchanath ^{[20
]}

Ghassemi, Akhtar-Ebrahimi ^{[21
]}

Jafarjalal, Ezzat ^{[22
]}

Zorba, Akile ^{[23
]}

Kuckert-Wostheinrich, Andrea ^{[24
]}

Malla, Rabin ^{[25
]}

Toda, Tomiko ^{[26
]}

Akman, Ozlem ^{[27
]}

Ozturk, Candan ^{[28
]}

Puvimanasinghe, Teresa ^{[29
]}

Ziaian, Tahereh ^{[30
]}

Eldar-Regev, Orit

Nissim, Sara ^{[31
]}

机构：

[1] Middlesex Univ, Res Ctr Transcultural Studies Hlth, Dept Mental Hlth & Social Work, Sch Hlth & Educ, London NW4 4BT, England

[2] Middlesex Univ, Dept Mental Hlth & Social Work, London, England

[3] Middlesex Univ, Western Sussex Hosp NHS Fdn Trust Worthing, Res Ctr Transcultural Studies Hlth, Worthing, W Sussex, England

[4] Middlesex Univ, Res Ctr Transcultural Studies Hlth, London, England

[5] Serv Madrileno Salud, Gerencia Asistencial Atenc Primaria, San Blas Primary Healthcare Ctr Southern Area, Madrid, Spain

[6] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Nursing Dept, Fac Med, Madrid, Spain

[7] Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Nursing, Sch Hlth Sci, Limassol, Cyprus

[8] Univ Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

[9] SZS VOSZ Havlickuv Brod, Sch Nursing, Havlickuv Brod, Czech Republic

[10] Univ South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

[11] Univ Thessaly, Larisa, Greece

[12] Univ West Attica, Fac Nursing, Campus Egaleo Pk, Egaleo, Greece

[13] State Univ Appl Sci Pila, Pila, Poland

[14] Rzeszow Univ, Med Coll, Inst Med Sci, Rzeszow, Poland

[15] Constantine Philosopher Univ Nitra, Fac Social Sci & Hlth Care, Nitra, Slovakia

[16] OsloMet Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Dept Nursing & Hlth Promot, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway

[17] VID Specialized Univ, Oslo, Norway

[18] Bataan Peninsula State Univ, Coll Nursing & Midwifery, Main Campus, Bataan, Philippines

[19] Bataan Peninsula State Univ, Bataan, Philippines

[20] Suratthani Rajabhat Univ, Fac Nursing, Surat Thani, Thailand

[21] Hartwick Coll, Nursing Dept, Oneonta, NY 13820 USA

[22] Iran Univ Med Sci IUMS, Nursing Res Ctr, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran, Iran

[23] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Dept Psychol, Fac Arts & Sci, Gazimagusa, Cyprus

[24] Vorarlberg Univ Appl Sci, Bachelor Programme Nursing, Dornbirn, Austria

[25] MICD, Kathmandu, Nepal

[26] Konan Womens Univ, Dept Nursing, Fac Nursing & Rehabil, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan

[27] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Nursing Dept, Fac Hlth Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye

[28] Near East Univ, Fac Nursing, Mersin, Turkiye

[29] Univ South Australia, Magill Campus, Magill, SA, Australia

[30] Univ South Australia, Ctr Workpl Excellence CWeX, Adelaide, SA, Australia

[31] Tel Aviv Univ, Tel Aviv, Israel

来源：

JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE | 2023年 / 20卷 / 02期

关键词：

artificial intelligence; cultural dimensions; socially assistive robots; technology acceptance; NATIONAL CULTURE; ADOPTION; DIFFUSION;

D O I：

10.1111/jjns.12523

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Aim: This study explored the views of an international sample of registered nurses and midwives working in health and social care concerning socially assistive robots (SARs), and the relationship between dimensions of culture and rejection of the idea that SARs had benefits in these settings. Methods: An online survey was used to obtain rankings of (among other topics) the extent to which SARs have benefits for health and social care. It also asked for free text responses regarding any concerns about SARs. Results: Most respondents were overwhelmingly positive about SARs' benefits. A small minority strongly rejected this idea, and qualitative analysis of the objections raised by them revealed three major themes: things might go wrong, depersonalization, and patient-related concerns. However, many participants who were highly accepting of the benefits of SARs expressed similar objections. Cultural dimensions of long-term orientation and uncertainty avoidance feature prominently in technology acceptance research. Therefore, the relationship between the proportion of respondents from each country who felt that SARs had no benefits and each country's ratings on long-term orientation and uncertainty avoidance were also examined. A significant positive correlation was found for long-term orientation, but not for uncertainty avoidance. Conclusion: Most respondents were positive about the benefits of SARs, and similar concerns about their use were expressed both by those who strongly accepted the idea that they had benefits and those who did not. Some evidence was found to suggest that cultural factors were related to rejecting the idea that SARs had benefits.

引用

页数：11

共 37 条

[21] The CARESSES study protocol: testing and evaluating culturally competent socially assistive robots among older adults residing in long term care homes through a controlled experimental trial [J].