CO2-negative fuel production using low-CO2 electricity: Syngas from a combination of methane pyrolysis and dry reforming with techno-economic analysis

被引:26
作者
Zong, Zhiyuan [1 ]
Cai, Genpei [1 ]
Tabbara, Majd [1 ]
Upham, D. Chester [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Syngas production; Methane pyrolysis; Dry reforming; Molten catalysis; CO2 abatement cost; BUBBLE-COLUMN REACTOR; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; MOLTEN METALS; STEAM; COST; GAS; CONVERSION; REDUCTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116624
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This work investigates the use of CO2 as a feedstock through a thermochemical approach using low-carbon electricity, in which the CO2 reforming and methane pyrolysis reactions are combined in a single electrically heated reactor (PY/DMR). The process is enabled by a molten metal catalyst which was recently reported. Kinetic data are experimentally determined for a molten Ni-In alloy and are then used to generate a process model and a techno-economic analysis. The activation energy for methane pyrolysis and dry reforming over molten Ni-In are 187 and 99 kJ/mol respectively. This results in a 236 m(3) rate-limited bubble-column reactor producing 500 kta syngas. PY/DMR is compared with a dry-reforming-based technology that is combined with steam reforming (SMR/DMR), state-of-art autothermal reforming (ATR), and CO2 co-electrolysis using solid oxide electrochemical cells from both an economic and environmental standpoint. In our present-day base case, SMR/DMR is the most affordable if no decoking is required ($179.2/t), while the commercialized ATR ($193.7/t) is similar to PY/DMR ($222/t). CO2 co-electrolysis is the least affordable case ($393.2/t). A sensitivity analysis indicates that the cost of PY/DMR is the most economically competitive case when clean (carbon intensity <= 160 g/kWh) and affordable (<=(sic)2.9/kwh) electricity is used, the solid carbon is sold at over $377/t, or when abatement cost reaches $104/t-CO2eq. Both PY/DMR and co-electrolysis result in net-negative CO2 emission, after heating and fugitive emissions are accounted for. The overall carbon footprints are -0.329 kg and -1.06 kg of CO2eq/kg-syngas respectively. PY/DMR has the lowest levelized CO2 mitigation cost ($60/t).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Optimization Approach to the Reduction of CO2 Emissions for Syngas Production Involving Dry Reforming [J].
Afzal, Shaik ;
Sengupta, Debalina ;
Sarkar, Amitava ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud ;
Elbashir, Nimir .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (06) :7532-7544
[2]  
Albonetti S., 2019, Horizons in sustainable industrial chemistry and catalysis
[3]   Optimized process configurations of post-combustion CO2 capture for natural-gas-fired power plant - Power plant efficiency analysis [J].
Amrollahi, Zeinab ;
Ystad, Paul Andreas Marchioro ;
Ertesvag, Ivar S. ;
Bolland, Olav .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 8 :1-11
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, GREENHOUSE GASES REG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Study on energy prices, costs and subsidies and their impact on industry and households
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FOCUS ON CATALYSTS, V2016, P7, DOI [10.1016/j.focat.2016.01.041, DOI 10.1016/J.FOCAT.2016.01.041]
[7]  
Assabumrungrat Nl S, 2009, Encycl Electrochem Power Sources, P238, DOI [10.1016/B978-044452745-5.00296-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-044452745-5.00296-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452745-5.00296-3]
[8]   FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010-2016 [J].
Bale, C. W. ;
Belisle, E. ;
Chartrand, P. ;
Decterov, S. A. ;
Eriksson, G. ;
Gheribi, A. E. ;
Hack, K. ;
Jung, I. -H. ;
Kang, Y. -B. ;
Melancon, J. ;
Pelton, A. D. ;
Petersen, S. ;
Robelin, C. ;
Sangster, J. ;
Spencer, P. ;
Van Ende, M-A. .
CALPHAD-COMPUTER COUPLING OF PHASE DIAGRAMS AND THERMOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 54 :35-53
[9]   Methane Conversion to Syngas for Gas-to-Liquids (GTL): Is Sustainable CO2 Reuse via Dry Methane Reforming (DMR) Cost Competitive with SMR and AIR Processes? [J].
Baltrusaitis, Jonas ;
Luyben, William L. .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (09) :2100-2111
[10]  
Bennett G.F., 2003, Journal of Hazardous Materials, V96, P342, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00254-6