What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework

被引:108
作者
Boud, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dawson, Phillip [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
[3] Middlesex Univ, London, England
关键词
Feedback literacy; pedagogical processes; inductive analysis; course design; academic development;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
If feedback is to be conducted effectively, then there needs to be clarity about what is involved and what is necessary for teachers to be able to undertake it well. While much attention has recently been devoted to student feedback literacy, less has been given to what is required of teaching staff in their various roles in feedback processes. This paper seeks to elucidate teacher feedback literacy through an analysis of the accounts of those who do feedback well. An inductive analysis was undertaken of conversations about feedback with 62 university teachers from five Australian universities using a dataset of transcripts of interviews and focus groups from two earlier research studies. Through an iterative process a teacher feedback literacy competency framework was developed which represents the competencies required of university teachers able to design and enact effective feedback processes. The paper discusses the different competencies required of those with different levels of responsibility, from overall course design to commenting on students' work. It concludes by considering implications for the professional development of university teachers in the area of feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 171
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Do those who benefit the most need it the least? A four-year experiment in enquiry-based feedback [J].
Adcroft, Andy ;
Willis, Robert .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (07) :803-815
[2]  
Ajjawi R, 2019, IMPACT OF FEEDBACK IN HIGHER EDUCATION: IMPROVING ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES FOR LEARNERS, P245, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_14
[3]   How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Dawson, Phillip ;
Bennett, Sue ;
Hall, Matt ;
Molloy, Elizabeth ;
Boud, David ;
Joughin, Gordon .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (01) :49-64
[4]   Feedback codes and action plans: building the capacity of first-year students to apply feedback to a scientific report [J].
Bird, Fiona L. ;
Yucel, Robyn .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 40 (04) :508-527
[5]   Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: exploring the use of interactive cover sheets [J].
Bloxham, Sue ;
Campbell, Liz .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (03) :291-300
[6]  
BOUD D, 2013, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V38
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, p11 101
[8]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[9]   Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class [J].
Broadbent, Jaclyn ;
Panadero, Ernesto ;
Boud, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (02) :307-322
[10]  
Carless D., 2015, Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice