Applying real options with reinforcement learning to assess commercial CCU deployment

被引:9
作者
Lee, Jeehwan S. [1 ]
Chun, Woopill [1 ]
Roh, Kosan [2 ]
Heo, Seongmin [1 ]
Lee, Jay H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 291 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Chem Engn & Appl Chem, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Chem Engn & Mat Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Carbon capture and utilization; Multi-period deployment; Real options theory; Reinforcement learning; Dynamic uncertainty; CARBON CAPTURE; FORMIC-ACID; ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION; CO2; INVESTMENT; METHANOL; STORAGE; POWER; COPOLYMERIZATION; HYDROGENATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102613
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and utilization (CCU), which emerged as a means to reduce anthropogenic carbon emissions, has been highlighted to close the carbon cycle and combat climate change. CCU involves utilizing or converting captured CO2 to create value-added products that can replace or supplement fossil fuel-derived products. In order to meet climate goals, commercial-scale CCU facilities need to be built and their capacities increased, but barriers to large-scale CCU deployment still exist, primarily caused by large uncertainties in product/energy prices, markets, technologies, and policies. Conventional techno-economic analysis (TEA) methods cannot appropriately assess viability of CCU deployment projects which include dynamic uncertainties and deployment strategies. More flexible methods that can account for both time-varying uncertainties and dynamic capacity building are needed. We propose a systematic framework for the evaluation of commercial CCU deployment using the theory of real options and reinforcement learning (RL). RL is needed as considering options of adding capacities or delaying/abandoning the project at multiple time points under dynamic uncertainties lead to a large-scale stochastic optimal control problem which cannot be solved using conventional optimization methods like stochastic programming. The framework consists of three steps: surrogate modeling, uncertainty modeling, and assessment modeling. The framework is dependent on the type of CCU technology, uncertainties, real options and RL al-gorithm. We demonstrate the application of the framework through a case study of CO2 hydrogenation-to-methanol process in Europe, which is a late-stage, i.e., high technology readiness level (TRL), technology.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Evaluation of two alternative carbon capture and storage technologies: A stochastic model [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Galarraga, Ibon ;
Ruebbelke, Dirk .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 54 :182-195
[2]   Bringing value to the chemical industry from capture, storage and use of CO2: A dynamic LCA of formic acid production [J].
Aldaco, Ruben ;
Butnar, Isabela ;
Margallo, Maria ;
Laso, Jara ;
Rumayor, Marta ;
Dominguez-Ramos, Antonio ;
Irabien, Angel ;
Dodds, Paul E. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 663 :738-753
[3]  
Anderson J., 2013, Chemical Engineering Progress
[4]   A risk-based evaluation of the impact of key uncertainties on the prediction of severe accident source terms - STU [J].
Ang, ML ;
Grindon, E ;
Dutton, LMC ;
Garcia-Sedano, P ;
Santamaria, CS ;
Centner, B ;
Auglaire, M ;
Routamo, T ;
Outa, S ;
Jokiniemi, J ;
Gustavsson, V ;
Wennerstrom, H ;
Spanier, L ;
Gren, M ;
Boschiero, MH ;
Droulas, JL ;
Friederichs, HG ;
Sonnenkalb, M .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2001, 209 (1-3) :183-192
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, ?Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook
[6]  
[Anonymous], Methanol
[7]  
[Anonymous], The Methanol Industry
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, World Energy Investment 2019
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Carbon capture, utilisation and storage
[10]  
[Anonymous], Methanol Market