The Influence of Patient Preference on Surgeons' Treatment Recommendations in the Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms

被引:1
|
作者
Sacks, Greg D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shin, Paul [4 ,5 ]
Braithwaite, R. Scott [6 ]
Soares, Kevin C. [4 ,5 ]
Kingham, T. Peter [4 ,5 ]
D'Angelica, Michael I. [4 ,5 ]
Drebin, Jeffrey A. [4 ,5 ]
Jarnagin, William R. [4 ,5 ]
Wei, Alice C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] NYU Langone Hlth, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] VA New York Harbor Healthcare Syst, New York, NY 11425 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Hepatopancreatobiliary Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[6] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY USA
关键词
pancreatic cysts; patient-centered care; patient preference; shared decision making; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; MEDICAL DECISIONS; HEALTH-CARE; STRATEGIES; QUALITY; IPMN; HIP;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005829
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We aimed to determine whether surgeon variation in management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) is driven by differences in risk perception and quantify surgeons' risk threshold for changing their recommendations.Background: Surgeons vary widely in management of IPMN.Methods: We conducted a survey of members of the Americas HepatoPancreatoBiliary Association, presented participants with 2 detailed clinical vignettes and asked them to choose between surgical resection and surveillance. We also asked them to judge the likelihood that the IPMN harbors cancer and that the patient would have a serious complication if surgery was performed. Finally, we asked surgeons to rate the level of cancer risk at which they would change their treatment recommendation. We examined the association between surgeons' treatment recommendations and their risk perception and risk threshold.Results: One hundred and fifty surgeons participated in the study. Surgeons varied in their recommendations for surgery [19% for vignette 1 (V1) and 12% for V2] and in their perception of the cancer risk (interquartile range: 2%-10% for V1 and V2) and risk of surgical complications (V1 interquartile range: 10%-20%, V2 20%-30%). After adjusting for surgeon characteristics, surgeons who were above the median in cancer risk perception were 22 percentage points (27% vs. 5%) more likely to recommend resection than those who were below the median (95% CI: 11.34%; P<0.001). The median risk threshold at which surgeons would change their recommendation was 15% (V1 and V2). Surgeons who recommended surgery had a lower risk threshold for changing their recommendation than those who recommended surveillance (V1: 10.0 vs. 15.0, P=0.06; V2: 7.0 vs. 15.0, P=0.05).Conclusions: The treatment that patients receive for IPMNs depends greatly on how their surgeons perceive the risk of cancer in the lesion. Efforts to improve cancer risk prediction for IPMNs may lead to decreased variations in care.
引用
收藏
页码:E1068 / E1072
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Distinct pathways of pathogenesis of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas
    Olca Basturk
    Sun M. Chung
    Ralph H. Hruban
    N. Volkan Adsay
    Gokce Askan
    Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue
    Serdar Balci
    Sui Y. Zee
    Bahar Memis
    Jinru Shia
    David S. Klimstra
    Virchows Archiv, 2016, 469 : 523 - 532
  • [22] Distinct pathways of pathogenesis of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas
    Basturk, Olca
    Chung, Sun M.
    Hruban, Ralph H.
    Adsay, N. Volkan
    Askan, Gokce
    Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine
    Balci, Serdar
    Zee, Sui Y.
    Memis, Bahar
    Shia, Jinru
    Klimstra, David S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 (05) : 523 - 532
  • [23] Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives
    IJM Levink
    MJ Bruno
    DL Cahen
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2018, 16 (3) : 316 - 332
  • [24] Familial intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas
    Rebours, Vinciane
    Couvelard, Anne
    Peyroux, Jean-Luc
    Sauvanet, Alain
    Hammel, Pascal
    Ruszniewski, Philippe
    Levy, Philippe
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2012, 44 (05) : 442 - 446
  • [25] The Role of Intraoperative Pancreatoscopy in the Surgical Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
    Grewal, Mahip
    Habib, Joseph R.
    Paluszek, Olivia
    Cohen, Steven M.
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Javed, Ammar A.
    PANCREAS, 2024, 53 (03) : e280 - e287
  • [26] Natural History and Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Current Evidence
    Fritz, Stefan
    Lerch, Markus M.
    VISZERALMEDIZIN, 2015, 31 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [27] Endosonographic diagnosis of advanced neoplasia in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
    Eiterman, Andrew
    Lahooti, Ali
    Krishna, Somashekar G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (23) : 3201 - 3212
  • [28] Risk factors for malignant progression of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
    Moris, Maria
    Raimondo, Massimo
    Woodward, Timothy A.
    Skinner, Verna
    Arcidiacono, Paolo G.
    Petrone, Maria C.
    De Angelis, Claudio
    Manfre, Selene
    Fusaroli, Pietro
    Wallace, Michael B.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2015, 47 (06) : 495 - 501
  • [29] Current Recommendations for Surveillance and Surgery of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms May Overlook Some Patients with Cancer
    Nguyen, Andrew H.
    Toste, Paul A.
    Farrell, James J.
    Clerkin, Barbara M.
    Williams, Jennifer
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Watson, Rabindra R.
    Tomlinson, James S.
    Hines, O. Joe
    Reber, Howard A.
    Donahue, Timothy R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (02) : 258 - 265
  • [30] Molecular Analysis of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid for the Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
    Turner, Ronald C.
    Melnychuk, Jared T.
    Chen, Wei
    Jones, Daniel
    Krishna, Somashekar G.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)