Sustainable Development in the Export Trade from a Symbiotic Perspective on Carbon Emissions, Exemplified by the Case of Guangdong, China

被引:3
作者
Wang, Shengyuan [1 ]
Pan, Meixia [1 ]
Wu, Xiaolan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Xiaozhuang Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211171, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Xiaozhuang Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Nanjing 211171, Peoples R China
关键词
export trade; carbon emission; symbiosis; Lotka-Volterra model; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FOREIGN-TRADE; CO2; EMISSIONS; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.3390/su15129667
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CO2 emissions are increasing with the expansion of export trade. Against the backdrop of the prominent trend of decarbonization in the global economy, the question of how to rise to the occasion to maintain the advantages of international trade, as well as achieving sustainable growth in export trade, has become an urgent issue for us to consider. This paper uses empirical analysis to propose and establish an econometric model of the symbiosis between carbon emissions and export trade dependence, economic structural changes and clean technology changes, based on the environmental Kuznets curve and using time series data for Guangdong Province from 2000 to 2021. The study found that there is a long-term, stable equilibrium relationship between the scale effect and technology effect on carbon emissions, and a positive relationship between the structural effect and carbon emissions. The study then constructed a symbiotic system of exports and carbon emissions from a symbiotic perspective. The Lotka-Volterra MCGP model was used to measure the evolution of the export and carbon emission symbiosis system from the optimization of three perspectives: the scale and structure of energy consumption under the dual constraints of export trade and carbon emissions, the scale of export trade under the carbon emission constraints, and the scale of carbon emissions under the export trade constraints. The results show that there is considerable room for improvement in the structure of energy consumption and carbon emissions in the current Guangdong export trade process. At the same time, this improvement can be achieved by adjusting the energy consumption structure and improving the efficiency of the system without changing the scale effect, technology effect or structural effect.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The world trade network and the environment
    Aller, Carlos
    Ductor, Lorenzo
    Herrerias, M. J.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 52 : 55 - 68
  • [2] Trade from resource-rich countries avoids the existence of a global pollution haven hypothesis
    Antonio Lopez, Luis
    Arce, Guadalupe
    Kronenberg, Tobias
    Rodrigues, Joao F. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 : 599 - 611
  • [3] Is free trade good for the environment?
    Antweiler, W
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) : 877 - 908
  • [4] Estimating the environmental and employment impacts of China's value-added trade from the perspective of value chain routes
    Bai, Shukuan
    Ning, Yadong
    Zhang, Boya
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (48) : 73414 - 73443
  • [5] Baumol W.J., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, P11
  • [6] CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China
    Chen, Yulong
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhong, Zhangqi
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 131 : 208 - 216
  • [7] Ching-Ter Chang, 2010, International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems, V1, P28, DOI 10.4018/joris.2010070103
  • [8] NORTH-SOUTH TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT
    COPELAND, BR
    TAYLOR, MS
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (03) : 755 - 787
  • [9] Trade, growth, and the environment
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2004, 42 (01) : 7 - 71
  • [10] Pollution haven or pollution halo? A Re-evaluation on the role of multinational enterprises in global CO2 emissions
    Duan, Yuwan
    Jiang, Xuemei
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 97