Energy efficiency of drinking water treatment plants: A methodologicalapproach for its ranking br

被引:6
作者
Maziotisa, Alexandros [1 ]
Mocholi-Arce, Manuel [2 ]
Sala-Garrido, Ramon [2 ]
Molinos-Senante, Maria [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Ingn Hidraul & Ambiental, Avda Vicuna Mackenna, Santiago 4860, Chile
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Matemat Econ & Empresa, Avda Tarongers,S-N, Spa, Valencia, Spain
[3] Ctr Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable CONICYT FONDAP 1, Avda Vicuna Mackenna, Santiago 4860, Chile
[4] Univ Valladolid, Inst Sustainable Proc, C Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid, Spain
关键词
Drinking water treatment; Energy efficiency; Performance; Data envelopment analysis; Common set of weights; Benchmarking; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COMPOSITE INDICATOR; WASTE; NEXUS; QUANTIFICATION; SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; INTENSITY; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160840
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Drinking water treatment systems (DWTSs) are energy intensive facilities, and are an example of the water-energynexus. Benchmarking energy efficiency is a valuable tool for improving the economic and environmental performanceof such facilities. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is typically used to assess efficiency, allocatingflexible weights(FSW) to variables that maximise energy efficiency scores for each DWTS (DEA-FSW). It means that different condi-tions are applied to each DWTS. Moreover, the DEA-FSW approach hasfinite discriminatory power which limitscross-unit comparison of energy efficiency hindering the benchmarking of DWTSs. To overcome these limitations,our study explored the effect of estimating the energy efficiency scores of DWTSs by allocating common sets of weights(CSW) within DEA (DEA-CSW). This approach was applied empirically on a sample of 146 DWTSs. Evaluated DWTSshad poor energetic performance based on both DEA-FSW and DEA-CSW estimates (low energy efficiency scores: 0.329and 0.163, respectively). Even in the optimistic scenario, the average energy efficiency score was low (0.220), withpotential electricity savings of 78 % by DWTPs when energy efficient. Unlike DEA-FSW, DEA-CSW allowed energyefficient DWTSs to be distinguished from the 146 facilities. Significant differences in the weights allocated to electric-ity and pollutants removed from raw water were reported for both approaches, and contributed to diverging energyefficiency scores. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the relevance of using suitable methods to generate compa-rable results for water companies, allowing the energy performance of DWTSs to be objectively evaluated forbenchmarking purposes
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: The perspective of centralized management [J].
Afsharian, Mohsen ;
Ahn, Heinz ;
Harms, Soren Guntram .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 294 (01) :3-15
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Greenhouse Gas Emissions
[4]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[5]  
Berg S., 2013, Water Utility Benchmarking, VSecond
[6]   Challenges and opportunities for drinking water treatment residuals (DWTRs) in metal-rich areas: an integrated approach [J].
Briso, Alejandro ;
Vega, Alejandra S. ;
Molinos-Senante, Maria ;
Pasten, Pablo .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (43) :65599-65612
[7]   Water -energy -carbon nexus approach for sustainable large-scale drinking water treatment operation [J].
Bukhary, Saria ;
Batista, Jacimaria ;
Ahmad, Sajjad .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 587
[8]   Performance in the treatment of municipal waste: Are European Union member states so different? [J].
Castillo-Gimenez, Juana ;
Montanes, Antonio ;
Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 687 :1305-1314
[9]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[10]   The State of US Urban Water: Data and the Energy-Water Nexus [J].
Chini, Christopher M. ;
Stillwell, Ashlynn S. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2018, 54 (03) :1796-1811