Physiological, Biochemical, and Gene Expression Responses of Sugarcane Under Cold, Drought and Salt Stresses

被引:6
|
作者
Kaura, V [1 ]
Malhotra, P. K. [1 ]
Mittal, A. [1 ]
Sanghera, G. S. [2 ]
Kaur, N. [3 ]
Bhardwaj, R. D. [4 ]
Cheema, R. S. [5 ]
Kaur, G. [6 ]
机构
[1] PAU, Sch Agr Biotechnol, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
[2] PAU, Reg Res Stn, Kapurthala 144601, Punjab, India
[3] PAU, Dept Plant Breeding & Genet, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[4] PAU, Dept Biochem, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[5] GADVASU, Coll Biotechnol, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[6] GADVASU, Dept Vet Microbiol, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
关键词
Sugarcane; Abiotic stresses; qRT-PCR; Gene expression; Adaptive stress response; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; ANTIOXIDANT RESPONSES; ABIOTIC STRESS; ORYZA-SATIVA; TOLERANCE; PROLINE; ACCUMULATION; ARABIDOPSIS; PROTEINS; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1007/s00344-022-10850-8
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The quantitative nature of abiotic stresses makes the understanding of its molecular basis a demanding task. For developing a rational breeding and/or genetic engineering strategy-understanding the environmental signal perception, its transmission to cellular machinery and adaptive responses of the plant is critical. Here, subjecting sugarcane seedlings to salt and cold stresses resulted in chlorosis, wilting, leaf rolling and the drought stress led to decrease in relative water content. The LPO content accumulated during drought and salt stress indicate the stress responses of the plant. The proline content increased in response to drought and salt stress underscore the proline function as an important osmoprotectant in sugarcane. The differential gene expression under drought, salt and cold stress for abiotic stress responsive genes like p5CS1, APX, CAT, GST, HSP, LEA, NAC, SOD, NHX, NFY, NCED, ERA, SOS, and DREB in sugarcane seedlings indicates the molecular basis of stress response in this commercially important crop.
引用
收藏
页码:6367 / 6376
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses
    Shinozaki, K
    Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K
    Seki, M
    CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2003, 6 (05) : 410 - 417
  • [32] Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics Related to Cold Resistance in Sugarcane
    Zhang, Bao-Qing
    Yang, Li-Tao
    Li, Yang-Rui
    SUGAR TECH, 2015, 17 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [33] Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics Related to Cold Resistance in Sugarcane
    Bao-Qing Zhang
    Li-Tao Yang
    Yang-Rui Li
    Sugar Tech, 2015, 17 : 49 - 58
  • [34] Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of durum wheat under salt stress
    Momeni, Mohammad Mehdi
    Kalantar, Mansoor
    Dehghani-Zahedani, Mahdi
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2021, 19 (02): : 93 - 103
  • [35] Proline Accumulation and Physiological Responses of Indica Rice Genotypes Differing in Tolerance to Salt and Drought Stresses
    Chutipaijit, Sutee
    Cha-um, Suriyan
    Sompornpailin, Kanokporn
    PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2010, 93 (02): : 165 - 169
  • [36] Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Metabolic Responses of Ginkgo biloba L. to Drought, Salt, and Heat Stresses
    Chang, Bang
    Ma, Kaibiao
    Lu, Zhaogeng
    Lu, Jinkai
    Cui, Jiawen
    Wang, Li
    Jin, Biao
    BIOMOLECULES, 2020, 10 (12) : 1 - 21
  • [37] Expression profiles of sugarcane under drought conditions: Variation in gene regulation
    Farias de Andrade, Julio Cesar
    Terto, Jackeline
    Silva, Jose Vieira
    Almeida, Cicero
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (04) : 465 - 469
  • [38] Physiological and biochemical responses of sorghum to drought stress
    Goche, T.
    Chivasa, S.
    Ngara, R.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 109 : 336 - 336
  • [39] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Medicagotruncatula to Drought Stress
    Hegab, M. M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 56 (03): : 895 - 912
  • [40] Physiological and biochemical responses of durum wheat under mild terminal drought stress
    Khamssi, Nahid Niari
    Najaphy, Abdollah
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2018, 64 (04) : 59 - 63