Optimizing Equity: Working towards Fair Machine Learning Algorithms in Laboratory Medicine

被引:8
作者
Azimi, Vahid [1 ]
Zaydman, Mark A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, St Louis Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jalm/jfac085
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Methods of machine learning provide opportunities to use real-world data to solve complex problems. Applications of these methods in laboratory medicine promise to increase diagnostic accuracy and streamline laboratory operations leading to improvement in the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. However, machine learning models are vulnerable to learning from undesirable patterns in the data that reflect societal biases. As a result, irresponsible application of machine learning may lead to the perpetuation, or even amplification, of existing disparities in healthcare outcomes.Content: In this work, we review what it means for a model to be unfair, discuss the various ways that machine learning models become unfair, and present engineering principles emerging from the field of algorithmic fairness. These materials are presented with a focus on the development of machine learning models in laboratory medicine.Summary: We hope that this work will serve to increase awareness, and stimulate further discussion, of this important issue among laboratorians as the field moves forward with the incorporation of machine learning models into laboratory practice.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 128
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1983, Finite Markov Chains: With a New Appendix Generalization of a Fundamental Matrix.
  • [2] Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk
    Bayat, Hassan
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 55 (11) : 1702 - 1708
  • [3] Berger J. O., 1985, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, V2
  • [4] Haimes Y.Y., 2005, Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management John Wiley
  • [5] Measuring classifier performance: a coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve
    Hand, David J.
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2009, 77 (01) : 103 - 123
  • [6] Parvin CA, 1997, CLIN CHEM, V43, P2149
  • [7] Ross S. M., 2014, Introduction to probability models, V11th, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2012-0-03564-8
  • [8] Is your assay stable? Using process stability and capability to evaluate assay performance
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    Pearson, Lauren N.
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 490 : 28 - 33
  • [9] Sheskin T.J., 2016, Markov Chains and Decision Processes for Engineers and Managers
  • [10] A multi-test planning model for risk based statistical quality control strategies
    Westgard, Sten A.
    Bayat, Hassan
    Westgard, James O.
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 523 : 216 - 223