AI Algorithmic Bias: Understanding its Causes, Ethical and Social Implications

被引:3
作者
Jain, Lakshitha R. [1 ]
Menon, Vineetha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Comp Sci, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
来源
2023 IEEE 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ICTAI | 2023年
关键词
Algorithmic bias; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Discrimination; Inequality; Ethics; Bias mitigation; Data variation; Algorithm design; Social impact; Diversity; Data integrity; Selection bias; Confirmation bias; Measurement bias; Social equality; Ethical analysis; Remediation; User input; Institutional bias; Fairness; Equity;
D O I
10.1109/ICTAI59109.2023.00073
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The escalating usage of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms across diverse fields has prompted apprehension regarding the propagation of algorithmic bias, which may exacerbate instances of discrimination and inequality. Algorithmic bias in AI and machine learning (ML) techniques manifests in real-world applications as a result of either insufficient data variation or augmentation availability in the AI/ML training data, or a flawed learning policy. This leads to the accidental propagation of AI bias as an unjust treatment of particular groups of individuals, owing to their race, gender [1], age, or other distinguishing attributes in practical applications. This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of algorithmic bias, encompassing its origins, ethical and social ramifications, and possible remediations. In addition, this paper introduces an innovative methodology for identifying and measuring algorithmic bias that integrates statistical analysis with input from users and domain specialists. This exposition examines distinct forms of algorithmic biases, such as selection bias, confirmation bias, and measurement bias, and examines underlying catalysts for algorithmic bias, encompassing data integrity concerns, decisions regarding algorithmic design, and institutional prejudgments. The adverse ramifications of algorithmic bias, including the perpetuation of social inequality and the impeding of societal advancement, are the focus of our examination. The present study seeks to make a contribution to the advancement of impartial [2] and equitable AI systems with the potential to foster societal progress and benefit individuals across diverse demographics by identifying the sources and repercussions of algorithmic bias and recommending efficacious interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 467
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Regulate or Revise: Addressing Algorithmic Bias in AI-driven Residential Mortgage Underwriting in Australia
    Yardi, Sonali
    JOURNAL OF BANKING AND FINANCE LAW AND PRACTICE, 2024, 34 (01):
  • [42] Algorithmic Management: Its Implications for Information Systems Research
    Cameron, Lindsey
    Lamers, Laura
    Leicht-Deobald, Ulrich
    Lutz, Christoph
    Meijerink, Jeroen
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 52 : 518 - 537
  • [43] Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities
    Lim, Hazel Si Min
    Taeihagh, Araz
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [44] Enhancing children's understanding of algorithmic biases in and with text-to-image generative AI
    Vartiainen, Henriikka
    Kahila, Juho
    Tedre, Matti
    Lopez-Pernas, Sonsoles
    Pope, Nicolas
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [45] AI and recruiting software: Ethical and legal implications
    Fernández-Martínez C.
    Fernández A.
    Paladyn, 2020, 11 (01): : 199 - 216
  • [46] Conservative AI and social inequality: conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory
    Mike Zajko
    AI & SOCIETY, 2021, 36 : 1047 - 1056
  • [47] Imagine a More Ethical AI: Using Stories to Develop Teens' Awareness and Understanding of Artificial Intelligence and its Societal Impacts
    Forsyth, Stacey
    Dalton, Bridget
    Foster, Ellie Haberl
    Walsh, Benjamin
    Smilack, Jacqueline
    Yeh, Tom
    IEEE STCBP RESPECT CONFERENCE: 2021 RESEARCH ON EQUITY AND SUSTAINED PARTICIPATION IN ENGINEERING, COMPUTING, AND TECHNOLOGY (RESPECT), 2021, : 276 - 277
  • [48] Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review
    Elendu, Chukwuka
    Amaechi, Dependable C.
    Elendu, Tochi C.
    Jingwa, Klein A.
    Okoye, Osinachi K.
    John Okah, Minichimso
    Ladele, John A.
    Farah, Abdirahman H.
    Alimi, Hameed A.
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (50) : E36671
  • [49] Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement
    Collins, Justin W.
    Marcus, Hani J.
    Ghazi, Ahmed
    Sridhar, Ashwin
    Hashimoto, Daniel
    Hager, Gregory
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Jannin, Pierre
    Maier-Hein, Lena
    Marz, Keno
    Valdastri, Pietro
    Mori, Kensaku
    Elson, Daniel
    Giannarou, Stamatia
    Slack, Mark
    Hares, Luke
    Beaulieu, Yanick
    Levy, Jeff
    Laplante, Guy
    Ramadorai, Arvind
    Jarc, Anthony
    Andrews, Ben
    Garcia, Pablo
    Neemuchwala, Huzefa
    Andrusaite, Alina
    Kimpe, Tom
    Hawkes, David
    Kelly, John D.
    Stoyanov, Danail
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (02): : 613 - 622
  • [50] Ethical implications of implicit bias in nursing education
    Edwards-Maddox, Shermel
    Reid, Amy
    Quintana, Danielle M.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2022, 17 (04) : 441 - 445