Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a tantalum cage: lumbar lordosis redistribution and sacral slope restoration with a modified posterior technique

被引:0
作者
Ferraro, Marcello [1 ]
Puglia, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Della Valle, Andrea [1 ]
Cerbone, Vincenzo [1 ,2 ]
Cicatelli, Alfonso [1 ,2 ]
Peroni, Donata Rita [1 ]
Cecconi, Davide [1 ]
Misaggi, Bernardo [1 ]
La Maida, Giovanni Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Orthopaed Inst Gaetano Pini, Spine Surg Dept, Via Gaetano Pini 1, I-20121 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
关键词
Tantalum; Cage; Lumbar lordosis; TLIF; Interbody fusion; POROUS TANTALUM; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; TRABECULAR METAL; PERFORMANCE; IMPLANTS; TLIF; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; COMPLICATIONS; SPINE; PLIF;
D O I
10.1186/s10195-023-00741-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), a commonly used procedure in spine surgery, has the advantage of a lower incidence of nerve lesions compared to the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique. The intersomatic arthrodesis has always been carried out with a single tantalum cage normally used for PLIF. Tantalum is a metal that is particularly used in orthopedic surgery. It has a modulus of elasticity similar to marrow and leads to high primary stability of the implant.Materials and methods: Our study was a retrospective monocentric observational study evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes of tantalum cages in a modified TLIF technique with posterior instrumentation and autologous and/or homologous posterolateral bone grafting. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and the increase in or redistribution of lumbar lordosis. The intersomatic arthrodesis was always carried out with a single tantalum cage normally used for PLIF to reduce the neurological risk. We retrospectively studied 105 patients who were treated with a modified unilateral TLIF approach by two surgeons between 2013 and 2018. We evaluated the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain, global lumbar lordosis, lordosis of L4-sacrum, segmental lordosis of functional motion units that underwent arthrodesis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and the sacral slope in 77 patients. All patients were suffering from grade III or IV Pfirrmann, instability, or foraminal post-laminectomy stenosis and/or grade I-II degenerative spondylolisthesis or low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. They had no significant sagittal imbalance, with a sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of < 5 mm. The average follow-up duration was 30 months.Results: We achieved excellent clinical results, with only four cases of failure (5.2%). Moreover, we noticed a statistically significant redistribution of lumbar lordosis, with an average percentage increase in L4-S1 lordosis equal to 19.9% (P < 0.001), an average increase in the L4-S1/Lumbar lordosis (LL) ratio from 0.53 to 0.63 (P < 0.001), and a mean percentage increase in sacral slope equal to 7.6% (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Thanks to the properties of tantalum, our modified single-portal TLIF technique is a valid surgical solution to obtain a solid arthrodesis and restore the correct lumbar lordosis distribution while reducing neurological complications and the number of failures.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Kurian, Shyam J.
    Wahood, Waseem
    Goyal, Anshit
    Elder, Benjamin D.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : 596 - +
  • [2] Black Jonathan, 1994, Clinical Materials, V16, P167, DOI 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90113-9
  • [3] Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial
    Bobyn, JD
    Stackpool, GJ
    Hacking, SA
    Tanzer, M
    Krygier, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05): : 907 - 914
  • [4] Cohen Robert, 2002, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V31, P216
  • [5] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) : 1712 - 1721
  • [6] Enhancing biology and providing structural support for acetabular reconstruction in single-stage revision for infection
    Ebied, Ayman M.
    Ebied, Ahmed A.
    Marei, Sameh
    Smith, Evert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [7] The Oswestry Disability Index
    Fairbank, JCT
    Pynsent, PB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) : 2940 - 2952
  • [8] Harrison PL, 2017, BONE JOINT J, V99B, P1153, DOI [10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1309.R1, 10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1309]
  • [9] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    O'Shaughnessy, Brian A.
    Sugrue, Patrick
    Salehi, Sean
    Ondra, Stephen
    Liu, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [10] Jadhakhan Feroz, 2023, J Spine Surg, V9, P83, DOI 10.21037/jss-22-24