System-driven design of flexible nuclear power plant configurations with thermal energy storage

被引:17
作者
Aunedi, Marko [1 ]
Kindi, Abdullah A. Al [2 ]
Pantaleo, Antonio M. [2 ,3 ]
Markides, Christos N. [2 ]
Strbac, Goran [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, Clean Energy Proc CEP Lab, London SW7, England
[3] Univ Bari, Dept Agroenvironm Sci, I-70121 Bari, Italy
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Flexible nuclear; Nuclear power; Power system flexibility; System -driven design; Thermal energy storage; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117257
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Nuclear power plants are expected to make an important contribution to the decarbonisation of electricity supply alongside variable renewable generation, especially if their operational flexibility is enhanced by coupling them with thermal energy storage. This paper presents a system modelling approach to identifying configurations of flexible nuclear plants that minimise the investment and operation costs in a decarbonised energy system, effectively proposing a system-driven design of flexible nuclear technology. Case studies presented in the paper explore the impact of system features on plant configuration choices. The results suggest that cost-efficient flexible nuclear configurations should adapt to the system they are located in. In the main low-carbon scenarios and assuming standard-size nuclear power plants (1,610 MWel), the lowest-cost system configuration included around 500 MWel of additional secondary generation capacity coupled to the nuclear power plants, with 4.5 GWhth of thermal storage capacity and a discharging duration of 2.2 h. Net system benefits per unit of flexible nuclear generation for the main scenarios were quantified at & POUND;29-33 m/yr for a wind-dominated system and & POUND;19-20 m/yr for a solar-dominated system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alameri SA, 2015, THESIS COLORADO SCH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, AS PAC SOL RES C
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, LAZARD'S levelized cost of energy analysis - version 15.0
  • [4] Aunedi M, 2022, 17 C SUST DEV EN WAT
  • [5] Aunedi M., 2021, NET ZERO GB ELECT CO
  • [6] Thermo-economic assessment of flexible nuclear power plants in future low-carbon electricity systems: Role of thermal energy storage
    Aunedi, Marko
    Pantaleo, Antonio M. M.
    Strbac, Goran
    Markides, Christos N. N.
    Al Kindi, Abdullah A.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 258
  • [7] Economic evaluation of shell-and-tube latent heat thermal energy storage for concentrating solar power applications
    Bai, F.
    Wang, Y.
    Wang, Z.
    Sun, Y.
    Beath, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, SOLARPACES 2014, 2015, 69 : 737 - 747
  • [8] Bank of England Database, DAIL SPOT EXCH RAT S
  • [9] Economic viability of light water small modular nuclear reactors: General methodology and vendor data
    Black, Geoffrey A.
    Aydogan, Fatih
    Koerner, Cassandra L.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 103 : 248 - 258
  • [10] Increasing Revenue of Nuclear Power Plants With Thermal Storage
    Borowiec, Katarzyna
    Wysocki, Aaron
    Shaner, Samuel
    Greenwood, Michael S.
    Ellis, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2020, 142 (04):