A Scoping Review of Health Care Faculty Mentorship Programs in Academia: Implications for Program Design, Implementation, and Outcome Evaluation

被引:11
作者
Crites, Gerald E. [1 ,2 ,11 ]
Ward, Wendy L. [3 ]
Archuleta, Penny [4 ]
Fornari, Alice [5 ,6 ]
Hill, Sarah E. M. [7 ]
Westervelt, Lauren M. [8 ]
Raymond, Nancy [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] AU UGA Med Partnership Augusta Univ & Univ Georgi, Fac Affairs & Dev, Athens, GA USA
[2] AU UGA Med Partnership Augusta Univ & Univ Georgi, Med, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Med, Little Rock, AR USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Donald & Barbara Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Educ Skills Dev, 500 Hofstra Univ, Hempstead, NY USA
[6] Donald & Barbara Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Sci Educ, Family Med & Occupat Hlth, 500 Hofstra Univ, Hempstead, NY USA
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Little Rock, AR USA
[8] Univ N Carolina, Off Fac Affairs & Leadership Dev, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Univ Wisconsin, Fac Affairs & Dev, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, 4125A Hlth Sci Learning Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[10] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Psychiat, 4125A Hlth Sci Learning Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[11] Augusta Univ & Univ Georgia Med Partnership, UGA Hlth Sci Campus,1425 Prince Ave, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
mentorship; faculty development; academic advancement; program design and evaluation; UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITY FACULTY; JUNIOR FACULTY; MENTORING PROGRAM; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; NEXT-GENERATION; MEDICINE; MODEL; SUCCESS; WOMEN; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1097/CEH.0000000000000459
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction:Formal mentoring programs have direct benefits for academic health care institutions, but it is unclear whether program designs use recommended components and whether outcomes are being captured and evaluated appropriately. The goal of this scoping review is to address these questions.Methods:We completed a literature review using a comprehensive search in SCOPUS and PubMed (1998-2019), a direct solicitation for unpublished programs, and hand-searched key references, while targeting mentor programs in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. After three rounds of screening, team members independently reviewed and extracted assigned articles for 40 design data items into a comprehensive database.Results:Fifty-eight distinct mentoring programs were represented in the data set. The team members clarified specific mentor roles to assist the analysis. The analysis identified mentoring program characteristics that were properly implemented, including identifying program goals, specifying the target learners, and performing a needs assessment. The analysis also identified areas for improvement, including consistent use of models/frameworks for program design, implementation of mentor preparation, consistent reporting of objective outcomes and career satisfaction outcomes, engagement of program evaluation methods, increasing frequency of reports as programs as they mature, addressing the needs of specific faculty groups (eg, women and minority faculty), and providing analyses of program cost-effectiveness in relation to resource allocation (return on investment).Conclusion:The review found that several mentor program design, implementation, outcome, and evaluation components are poorly aligned with recommendations, and content for URM and women faculty members is underrepresented. The review should provide academic leadership information to improve these discrepancies.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 51
页数:10
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Building capacity for education research among clinical educators in the health professions: A BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) Systematic Review of the outcomes of interventions: BEME Guide No. 34 [J].
Ahmed, Rabia ;
Farooq, Ameer ;
Storie, Dale ;
Hartling, Lisa ;
Oswald, Anna .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (02) :123-136
[2]  
American Association of Medical Colleges, 2019 US MED SCH FAC
[3]  
Ardery Nina L, 2014, Ann Am Thorac Soc, V11, P600, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201402-064PS
[4]  
Badawy SM., 2017, PEDIAT BLOOD CANC, V64, P10
[5]  
Bailey JM., 2018, MED SCI EDUC, V28, P773
[6]   The Impact of a National Faculty Development Program Embedded Within an Academic Professional Organization [J].
Baldwin, Constance D. ;
Gusic, Maryellen E. ;
Chandran, Latha .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 92 (08) :1105-1113
[7]   Mentoring Programs for Underrepresented Minority Faculty in Academic Medical Centers: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Beech, Bettina M. ;
Calles-Escandon, Jorge ;
Hairston, Kristen G. ;
Langdon, Sarah E. ;
Latham-Sadler, Brenda A. ;
Bell, Ronny A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2013, 88 (04) :541-549
[8]   How we developed the GIM clinician-educator mentoring and scholarship program to assist faculty with promotion and scholarly work [J].
Bertram, Amanda ;
Yeh, Hsin Chieh ;
Bass, Eric B. ;
Brancati, Frederick ;
Levine, David ;
Cofrancesco, Joseph, Jr. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (02) :131-135
[9]  
Bland CaroleJ., 2009, FACULTY SUCCESS MENT
[10]   Leadership in Adolescent Health: Developing the Next Generation of Maternal Child Health Leaders Through Mentorship [J].
Blood, Emily A. ;
Trent, Maria ;
Gordon, Catherine M. ;
Goncalves, Adrianne ;
Resnick, Michael ;
Fortenberry, J. Dennis ;
Boyer, Cherrie B. ;
Richardson, Laura ;
Emans, S. Jean .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 19 (02) :308-313