Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach

被引:3
|
作者
Slade, Emily [1 ,7 ]
Kern, Philip A. A. [2 ,3 ]
Kegebein, Robert L. L. [3 ]
Liu, Chang [4 ]
Thompson, Joel C. C. [3 ]
Kelly, Thomas H. H. [5 ]
King, Victoria L. L. [2 ]
DiPaola, Robert S. S. [6 ]
Surratt, Hilary L. L. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Biostat, Lexington, KY USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Internal Med, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Ctr Clin & Translat Sci, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Markey Canc Ctr, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Dept Behav Sci, Lexington, KY USA
[6] Univ Kentucky, Off Provost, Lexington, KY USA
[7] Univ Kentucky, Dept Biostat, 725 Rose St,Suite 205, Lexington, KY 40508 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Team science; transdisciplinary research; collaboration; mixed methods; evaluation; TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PERFORMANCE; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; DIVERSITY; EDUCATION; SERVICES; BENEFITS; QUALITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1017/cts.2023.9
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction:Impactful, transdisciplinary scientific discoveries are created by teams of researchers spanning multiple disciplines, but collaboration across disciplines can be challenging. We examined how team dynamics and collaboration are related to successes and barriers faced by teams of researchers from multiple disciplines. Methods:A mixed-methods approach was used to examine 12 research teams granted multidisciplinary pilot awards. Team members were surveyed to assess their team dynamics and individual views about transdisciplinary research. Forty-seven researchers (59.5%) responded, including two to eight members from each funded team. Associations were examined between collaborative dynamics and scholarly product outcomes, including manuscripts, grant proposals, and awarded grants. One member from each team was selected for an in-depth interview to contextualize and extend information about collaborative processes, successes, and barriers to performing transdisciplinary research. Results:Quality of team interactions was positively associated with achievement of scholarly products (r = 0.64, p = 0.02). Satisfaction with team members (r = 0.38) and team collaboration scores (r = 0.43) also demonstrated positive associations with achievement of scholarly products, but these were not statistically significant. Qualitative results support these findings and add further insight into aspects of the collaborative process that were particularly important to foster success on multidisciplinary teams. Beyond scholarly metrics, additional successes from the multidisciplinary teams were identified through the qualitative portion of the study including career development and acceleration for early career researchers. Conclusions:Both the quantitative and qualitative study results indicate that effective collaboration is critical to multidisciplinary research team success. Development and/or promotion of team science-based trainings for researchers would promote these collaborative skills.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, or Dysfunctional? Team Working in Mixed-Methods Research
    O'Cathain, Alicia
    Murphy, Elizabeth
    Nicholl, Jon
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (11) : 1574 - 1585
  • [2] PERCEIVED GAPS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM MANAGEMENT OF SLEEP DISORDERS: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH
    Dupuis, M.
    Cytryn, K. N.
    Castriotta, R. J.
    Landrigan, C. P.
    Malhotra, A.
    Murray, S.
    SLEEP, 2010, 33 : A365 - A365
  • [3] Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study
    Polomeni, Alice
    Bordessoule, Dominique
    Malak, Sandra
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study
    Alice Polomeni
    Dominique Bordessoule
    Sandra Malak
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [5] Role of team dynamics in the learning process: a mixed-methods evaluation of a modified team-based learning approach in a behavioral research methods course
    Walker, Elizabeth Reisinger
    Lang, Delia L.
    Caruso, Bethany A.
    Salas-Hernandez, Leslie
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2020, 25 (02) : 383 - 399
  • [6] Role of team dynamics in the learning process: a mixed-methods evaluation of a modified team-based learning approach in a behavioral research methods course
    Elizabeth Reisinger Walker
    Delia L. Lang
    Bethany A. Caruso
    Leslie Salas-Hernández
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2020, 25 : 383 - 399
  • [7] Assessing and Evaluating Multidisciplinary Translational Teams: A Mixed Methods Approach
    Wooten, Kevin C.
    Rose, Robert M.
    Ostir, Glenn V.
    Calhoun, William J.
    Ameredes, Bill T.
    Brasier, Allan R.
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2014, 37 (01) : 33 - 49
  • [8] Contextualizing Team Adaptation for Fostering Creative Outcomes in Multicultural Virtual Teams: A Mixed Methods Approach
    Shirish, Anuragini
    Srivastava, Shirish C.
    Boughzala, Imed
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (03): : 700 - 744
  • [9] The dynamics of multidisciplinary research teams in academia
    Younglove-Webb, J
    Gray, B
    Abdalla, CW
    Thurow, AP
    REVIEW OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1999, 22 (04): : 425 - +
  • [10] ADVANCING PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH FOR RARE DISEASES: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH
    Cheng, M.
    Chapman, R.
    Kennedy, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S333 - S333