A comparison of the nutritional content and price between dairy and non-dairy milks and cheeses in UK supermarkets: A cross sectional analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Glover, Alex [1 ]
Hayes, Helen E. [1 ]
Ni, He [2 ]
Raikos, Vassilios [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Rowett Inst, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] South China Normal Univ, Sch Life Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Biotechnol Plant Dev, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Dairy; milk; cheese; dairy alternatives; nutrient content; price; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS; COCONUT OIL CONSUMPTION; PREGNANT-WOMEN; IODINE DEFICIENCY; EPIC-OXFORD; CALCIUM; ACID; VITAMIN-B12; QUALITY; COHORT;
D O I
10.1177/02601060221105744
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Non-Dairy (ND) food consumption is rapidly increasing in the UK and for many consumers plant-based diets are presumed to be healthier than standard diets. ND alternatives have different nutritional compositions, and their consumption could present challenges on a public-health level. Aim: To compare the price and nutritional composition of dairy and ND milks and cheeses in UK supermarkets. Methods: Macro and micronutrient data was recorded from Alpro's website and the 6 leading UK grocers for their own-label ND milks and cheeses. For missing micronutrient values the McCance & Widdowson's dataset was used. 99 total products were extracted: 57 ND milks, 7 dairy milks, 10 dairy cheeses and 25 ND cheeses. Dairy milk and cheese were used as control against which all ND products were compared. Results: Soya and coconut milks had lower values of carbohydrates, sugars, calcium, iodine, and potassium (p < 0.01) than dairy. Almond milk had lower values of carbohydrates (p = 0.01), sugars, calcium, iodine, and potassium (p < 0.01) compared to dairy milk. Protein was significantly (p < 0.01) lower for all ND except soya. Dairy cheeses had higher values for energy, protein, iodine, potassium, riboflavin, vitamin B12 and calcium (p < 0.01) than ND. Median prices were similar between dairy and ND milks, whereas ND cheeses were significantly more expensive compared to dairy (p < 0.01). Conclusions: ND alternatives fall short in several key nutrients compared to dairy. Fortification, accurate labelling and nutrition education are needed to help consumers make healthy and informed choices.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] International Analysis of the Nutritional Content and a Review of Health Benefits of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Beverages
    Craig, Winston J.
    Fresan, Ujue
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 14
  • [2] Nutritional Content and Health Profile of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Yogurt Alternatives
    Craig, Winston J.
    Brothers, Cecilia J.
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [3] Nutritional Content and Health Profile of Single-Serve Non-Dairy Plant-Based Beverages
    Craig, Winston J.
    Brothers, Cecilia J.
    Mangels, Reed
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [4] Associations of fermented and non-fermented dairy consumption with serum C-reactive protein concentrations - A cross-sectional analysis
    Voutilainen, Elisa K.
    Hantunen, Sari
    Ruusunen, Anu
    Tuomainen, Tomi-Pekka
    Virtanen, Jyrki K.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2022, 48 : 401 - 407
  • [5] Cross-Sectional Study to Map Nutritional Quality of Meat, Fish, and Dairy Alternatives in Dutch Supermarkets According to the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and Nutri-Score
    Huybers, Sylvie
    Roodenburg, Annet J. C.
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [6] Dose-response relationships between dairy intake and non-communicable chronic diseases: an NHANES-based cross-sectional study
    Zhao, Yan
    Ji, Xiaoning
    Guo, Panpan
    Onwuka, Justina Ucheojor
    Zhang, Ying
    He, Hui
    Luo, Chao
    Wang, Liang
    Tang, Ningxin
    Zhao, Jueqiong
    Feng, Rennan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2022, 73 (04) : 552 - 563
  • [7] The nutritional content of children's breakfast cereals: a cross-sectional analysis of New Zealand, Australia, the UK, Canada and the USA
    Chepulis, Lynne
    Everson, Nadine
    Ndanuko, Rhoda
    Mearns, Gael
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2020, 23 (09) : 1589 - 1598