Understanding Rural Identities and Environmental Policy Attitudes in America

被引:19
作者
Diamond, Emily P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Commun Studies, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Marine Affairs, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
关键词
URBAN DIFFERENCES; GROUP CONSCIOUSNESS; PLACE; PREDICTORS; BEHAVIOR; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1017/S1537592721002231
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Attitudinal differences between urban and rural voters in America have been in the spotlight in recent years and engaging rural populations politically has been growing in importance, particularly since the 2016 presidential election. Meanwhile, social and geographic sorting is increasing the salience of a rural identity that drives distinct policy preferences. While recent research has examined how rural identities drive social and economic policy preferences, rural Americans are also particularly relevant to the fate of environmental policy. Farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners manage huge portions of American lands and watersheds and are important stakeholders in the implementation of environmental policies. Despite this, the environmental policy preferences of rural Americans have received little attention from the research community. This study fills a gap in the literature by investigating how collective identities among rural Americans drive environmental policy preferences. Through eight focus groups and thirty-five interviews with rural voters across America (total n=105), this study explores how four components of rural American identity- connection to nature, resentment/disenfranchisement, rootedness, and self-reliance-inform specific rural perspectives on environmental policy. The findings have implications for how to best design, communicate, and implement environmental policies in a way that can better engage rural Americans on this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 518
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [21] RURAL-URBAN DIFFERENCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN - A CLOSER LOOK
    FREUDENBURG, WR
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1991, 61 (02) : 167 - 198
  • [22] Gallay E., 2016, Peabody Journal of Education, V91, P155, DOI DOI 10.1080/0161956X.2016.1151736
  • [23] The Urban-Rural Gulf in American Political Behavior
    Gimpel, James G.
    Lovin, Nathan
    Moy, Bryant
    Reeves, Andrew
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 42 (04) : 1343 - 1368
  • [24] Green Donald P., 2002, Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identity of Voters
  • [25] Greenlee Jill S., 2014, POLITICAL CONSEQUENC
  • [26] Place Effects on Environmental Views
    Hamilton, Lawrence C.
    Colocousis, Chris R.
    Duncan, Cynthia M.
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) : 326 - 347
  • [27] RURAL-URBAN DIFFERENCES REFLECTED IN OUTDOOR RECREATION PARTICIPATION
    HENDEE, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1969, 1 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [28] Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity
    Hinds, Joe
    Sparks, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 28 (02) : 109 - 120
  • [29] Hochschild AR., 2018, STRANGERS THEIR OWN
  • [30] From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory
    Huddy, L
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 22 (01) : 127 - 156