Meta-analysis of downregulated E-cadherin as a diagnostic biomarker for cervical cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Ma, Xiaoxia [1 ,2 ]
Ge, An [1 ,2 ]
Han, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Jin [3 ]
Zhang, Yating [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiaohong [3 ]
Xing, Li [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiaochun [3 ]
Dong, Li [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Univ, Inst Biomed Sci, 92 Wucheng Rd, Taiyuan 030006, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Univ, Key Lab Med Mol Cell Biol Shanxi Prov, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[3] Shanxi Med Univ, Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Tongji Shanxi Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci,Hosp 3, 99 Longcheng Rd, Taiyuan 030032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
E-cadherin; Cervical cancer; Diagnostic accuracy; Meta-analysis; HPV-POSITIVE WOMEN; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; LANGERHANS CELLS; BETA-CATENIN; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; IMMUNOEXPRESSION; PROGRESSION; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-022-06475-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Downregulation of E-cadherin function or expression has been implicated in the progression of cervical cancer. This meta-analysis of updated publications was performed to assess the association of expression alteration of E-cadherin with disease severity and then to determine the diagnostic accuracy of E-cadherin in discriminating cervical lesions including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 (CIN1), CIN grade 2 (CIN2), CIN grade 3 (CIN3), and cervical cancer. Methods The articles published from inception to January 2021 were searched in PubMed, EBSCO, CNKI, and WanFang Database and then evaluated according to the criteria of meta-analysis. The eligible studies were retrieved and further analyzed. A bivariate mixed effects binary regression model was applied to determine pooled effect estimates. Results 16 studies with 2436 subjects from 7 countries were eligible for this meta-analysis. When compared with CIN1 control, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association of E-cadherin positivity with CIN2, CIN3, and cervical cancer were 0.34 (95% CI 0.23-0.51), 0.23 (95% CI 0.10-0.54), and 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.14), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for CIN3 or worse were 0.60 (95% CI 0.48-0.70) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.88) respectively, with the AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.82). Similar performance was found in CIN2 or worse. Conclusion These findings demonstrated that the loss of E-cadherin protein was associated with worsened cervical lesions. E-cadherin might serve as a promising diagnostic biomarker to facilitate the discrimination of precancerous and cancerous lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 341
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reduced E-cadherin expression is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Yongpeng
    Li, Pin
    Gao, Yu
    Gu, Liangyou
    Chen, Luyao
    Fan, Yang
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhang, Xu
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (37) : 62489 - 62499
  • [22] Overexpression of E-Cadherin Is a Favorable Prognostic Biomarker in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lorenzo-Pouso, Alejandro I.
    Silva, Fabio Franca-Vieira e
    Perez-Jardon, Alba
    Chamorro-Petronacci, Cintia M.
    Oliveira-Alves, Monica G.
    Alvarez-Calderon-Iglesias, Oscar
    Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto
    Pinti, Morena
    Perrotti, Vittoria
    Perez-Sayans, Mario
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [23] The impact of E-cadherin expression on non-small cell lung cancer survival: a meta-analysis
    Ying Wu
    Hong-Bing Liu
    Ming Ding
    Jian-Nan Liu
    Ping Zhan
    Xiao-Su Fu
    Gan Lu
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39 : 9621 - 9628
  • [24] Reduced E-cadherin expression as a prognostic factor in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, T.
    Fan, J.
    Liang, H.
    He, D.
    Zeng, X.
    Wu, K.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2020, 30 (02): : 66 - 74
  • [25] E-cadherin deregulation in breast cancer
    Corso, Giovanni
    Figueiredo, Joana
    De Angelis, Simone Pietro
    Corso, Federica
    Girardi, Antonia
    Pereira, Joana
    Seruca, Raquel
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Carneiro, Patricia
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    Guerini Rocco, Elena
    Veronesi, Paolo
    Montagna, Giacomo
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Gandini, Sara
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (11) : 5930 - 5936
  • [26] Expression and Localization of E-Cadherin in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Koensgen, Dominique
    Freitag, Cornelia
    Klaman, Irina
    Dahl, Edgar
    Mustea, Alexander
    Chekerov, Radoslav
    Braicu, Ioana
    Lichtenegger, Werner
    Sehouli, Jalid
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (07) : 2525 - 2530
  • [27] Promoter methylation and polymorphism of E-cadherin gene may confer a risk to prostate cancer: a meta-analysis based on 22 studies
    Chang, Zheng
    Zhou, Hongbing
    Liu, Yi
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (10) : 10503 - 10513
  • [28] A systematic review and meta-analysis combined with bioinformatic analysis on the predictive value of E-cadherin in patients with renal cell carcinoma
    Zhang, Zikuan
    Xue, Bo
    Chen, Yongquan
    Shao, Yuan
    Wang, Dongwen
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 24 (09) : 859 - 871
  • [29] P-cadherin promotes cervical cancer growth and invasion through affecting the expression of E-cadherin and p120 catenin
    Li, Baohua
    Gong, Danzhu
    Wang, Fenfen
    Wan, Xiaoyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 40 (02) : 224 - 231
  • [30] Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of Downregulated E-Cadherin Expression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Yan-Long
    Chen, Ming-Wu
    Xian, Lei
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):