Efficiency evaluation of healthcare services in China based on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis and directional distance function

被引:11
作者
Wei, Fangqing [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoqi [1 ,2 ]
Song, Jiayun [1 ]
Yang, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, 96 Jinzhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Polytech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 8 Beijing Middle Rd, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
healthcare service efficiency; directional distance function; stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis; data envelopment analysis; DECISION-MAKING UNITS; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE; DOMINANCE RELATIONS; DEA; SYSTEMS; INTERVALS; QUALITY; BENEFIT; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/itor.13085
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Evaluating the efficiency of healthcare services accurately can help in analyzing the rationality of inputs and outputs in such services. Considering the consistency and equity of assessment criteria, this study conducts the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-2) with a directional distance function to evaluate the efficiency of healthcare services in 31 provincial administrative regions of mainland China, as observed in 2018. We use SMAA-DDF to explore all the projection directions to the efficient frontier instead of a certain projection direction. We measure the maximum and average efficiencies for each of the 31 provincial healthcare services. Our empirical findings show that only seven provinces achieve optimal healthcare service efficiency; the eastern area performed the best, followed by the central, western, and northeast areas. Furthermore, the path along the projection directions is provided to help inefficient provinces improve their efficiency and obtain the best possible positions.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 393
页数:25
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   An Efficient Frontier Approach to Scoring and Ranking Hospital Performance [J].
Adelman, Daniel .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 68 (03) :762-792
[2]  
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econ., V6, P21, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
[3]   Efficiency analysis of emergency departments in metropolitan areas [J].
Akkan, Can ;
Karadayi, Melis Almula ;
Ekinci, Yeliz ;
Ulengin, Fusun ;
Uray, Nimet ;
Karaosmanoglu, Elif .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2020, 69
[4]   Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations: A metaheuristic approach [J].
Alcaraz, J. ;
Monge, J. F. ;
Ramon, N. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2022, 73 (04) :779-793
[5]   Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations [J].
Alcaraz, Javier ;
Ramon, Nuria ;
Ruiz, Jose L. ;
Sirvent, Inmaculada .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 226 (03) :516-521
[6]   Efficiency evaluation and ranking of supply chains based on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis and data envelopment analysis [J].
Ang, Sheng ;
Zhu, Yunxia ;
Yang, Feng .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (06) :3190-3219
[7]   Measuring Arbitrage Opportunities A Minimum Performance Inefficiency Estimation Technique [J].
Anokhin, Sergey ;
Troutt, Marvin D. ;
Wincent, Joakim ;
Brandyberry, Alan A. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 13 (01) :55-66
[8]   Accounting for quality in the measurement of hospital performance:: evidence from Costa Rica [J].
Arocena, Pablo ;
Garcia-Prado, Ariadna .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (07) :667-685
[9]   Decision quality using ranked attribute weights [J].
Barron, FH ;
Barrett, BE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (11) :1515-1523
[10]   Hospital efficiency with risk adjusted mortality as undesirable output: the Turkish case [J].
Bilsel, Murat ;
Davutyan, Nurhan .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2014, 221 (01) :73-88