Proposed Resolution to the Solar Open Magnetic Flux Problem

被引:9
作者
Arge, C. Nick [1 ]
Leisner, Andrew [2 ]
Antiochos, Spiro K. [3 ]
Wallace, Samantha [1 ]
Henney, Carl J. [4 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Climate & Space Sci & Engn, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, NM USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LONG-TERM VARIATION; CYCLES; 23; FIELD; INTERPLANETARY; SIMULATIONS; DYNAMICS; MODEL; WIND;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/ad20e2
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The solar magnetic fields emerging from the photosphere into the chromosphere and corona are comprised of a combination of closed (field lines with both ends rooted at the Sun) and open (field lines with only one end at the Sun) fields. Since the early 2000s, the magnitude of total unsigned open magnetic flux estimated by coronal models has been in significant disagreement with in situ spacecraft observations, especially during solar maximum. Estimates of total open unsigned magnetic flux using coronal hole observations (e.g., using extreme ultraviolet or helium (He) I) are in general, in average agreement with the coronal model results and thus show similar disagreements with in situ observations. This paper provides a brief overview of the problem, summarizes the proposed explanations for the discrepancies, and presents results that strongly support the explanation that the discrepancy is due to dynamics at the open-closed boundary. These results are derived from the determination of the total unsigned open magnetic flux, utilizing the Wang-Sheeley-Arge model at a particular spatial resolution and different field-line tracing methods. One of these methods produces excellent agreement with in situ observations. Our results imply that strong magnetic fields in close proximity to active regions and residing near the boundaries of mid-latitude coronal holes are the primary source of the missing open flux. Furthermore, the results outlined here resolve many of the seemingly contradictory facts that have made the open-flux problem so difficult.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   MAGNETIC FIELDS AND STRUCTURE OF SOLAR CORONA .I. METHODS OF CALCULATING CORONAL FIELDS [J].
ALTSCHULER, MD ;
NEWKIRK, G .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1969, 9 (01) :131-+
[2]   A MODEL FOR THE SOURCES OF THE SLOW SOLAR WIND [J].
Antiochos, S. K. ;
Mikic, Z. ;
Titov, V. S. ;
Lionello, R. ;
Linker, J. A. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 731 (02)
[3]   A "breathing" source surface for cycles 23 and 24 [J].
Arden, W. M. ;
Norton, A. A. ;
Sun, X. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2014, 119 (03) :1476-1485
[4]   Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near-real time solar magnetic field updates [J].
Arge, CN ;
Pizzo, VJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A5) :10465-10479
[5]   Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME [J].
Arge, CN ;
Luhmann, JG ;
Odstrcil, D ;
Schrijver, CJ ;
Li, Y .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2004, 66 (15-16) :1295-1309
[6]   Two solar cycles of nonincreasing magnetic flux [J].
Arge, CN ;
Hildner, E ;
Pizzo, VJ ;
Harvey, JW .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2002, 107 (A10)
[7]  
Arge CN, 2003, AIP CONF PROC, V679, P190, DOI 10.1063/1.1618574
[8]   The Dynamic Structure of Coronal Hole Boundaries [J].
Aslanyan, V. ;
Pontin, D. I. ;
Scott, R. B. ;
Higginson, A. K. ;
Wyper, P. F. ;
Antiochos, S. K. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 931 (02)
[9]   Measurement of the open magnetic flux in the inner heliosphere down to 0.13 AU [J].
Badman, Samuel T. ;
Bale, Stuart D. ;
Rouillard, Alexis P. ;
Bowen, Trevor A. ;
Bonnell, John W. ;
Goetz, Keith ;
Harvey, Peter R. ;
MacDowall, Robert J. ;
Malaspina, David M. ;
Pulupa, Marc .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2021, 650
[10]   The heliospheric magnetic field at solar maximum:: Ulysses observations [J].
Balogh, A ;
Smith, EJ .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2001, 97 (1-4) :147-160