RESPONSE OF MAIZE CULTIVARS TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ORGANIC AND NANO-COMPOUND NPK FERTILIZERS

被引:3
作者
Zaki, S. M. [1 ]
Ahmed, R. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Telafer, Coll Agr, Dept Field Crops, Tal Afar, Iraq
[2] Univ Mosul, Coll Agr & Forestry, Dept Field Crops, Mosul, Iraq
来源
SABRAO JOURNAL OF BREEDING AND GENETICS | 2023年 / 55卷 / 06期
关键词
Maize (Zea mays L.); cultivars; organic fertilizer; NPK; nano fertilizer; foliar application; grain yield; TRAITS;
D O I
10.54910/sabrao2023.55.6.36
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The experiment proceeded in the Telafer site during the year 2022, with two seasons (spring and autumn) to study two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars (Furat and Dijla) and eight levels of fertilizers (control treatment, 120 kg N15P15K15 ha-1 of traditional compound fertilizer, 1.5 and 3 g liter-1 of N20P20K20 nano fertilizer, 1 and 2 ml liter-1 of Optimum Plus organic fertilizer, 1.5g liter-1 of N20P20K20 nano fertilizer + 1 ml liter-1 of organic fertilizer, and 3 g liter-1 of N20P20K20 nano fertilizer + 2ml liter-1 of organic fertilizer) on yield traits of the maize grain. The research employed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) using the split-plot system, with the cultivars placed in the main plots, and the fertilizers in the secondary plots. Results indicated that the Furat cultivar excelled in all yield traits in the two seasons, except for the weight of the cob and the weight of 500 grains in the autumn season; cultivar Dijla was superior in the biological yield for the two seasons. As for the fertilizers, the treatment 2ml L-1 of the organic fertilizer achieved the highest rate in all studied traits for both seasons, except for the traits cob weight and biological yield, where the treatment was superior in 3 g L-1 of the N20P20K20 nanofertilizer. The interaction showed significant differences in all studied traits of maize in both seasons.
引用
收藏
页码:2256 / 2268
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Ali W., 2018, Eur J Experimental Biology, V8, P36, DOI [10.21767/2248-9215.100077, DOI 10.21767/2248-9215.100077]
[2]  
Alnori MA, 2013, Tikrit J. Agric. Sci., V13, P287
[3]  
Alzreejawi S. A. M., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V553, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012010
[4]   Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998-2013) [J].
Bashan, Yoav ;
de-Bashan, Luz E. ;
Prabhu, S. R. ;
Hernandez, Juan-Pablo .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2014, 378 (1-2) :1-33
[5]   Yield and Growth Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Varietal and Nitrogen Application in the Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecology of Ghana [J].
Bawa, Alhassan .
ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE, 2021, 2021
[6]   Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture [J].
Bhattacharyya, P. N. ;
Jha, D. K. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (04) :1327-1350
[7]  
Brunner Pamela Karoline Correia, 2020, Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto), V12, P188, DOI 10.5539/jas.v12n10p188
[8]  
Chozin M, 2017, SABRAO J BREED GENET, V49, P361
[9]  
Elsahookie MM, 2021, IRAQI J AGRIC SCI, V52, P1219, DOI 10.36103/ijas.v52i5.1459
[10]  
Grover M., 2012, Int. J. Nanotechnol. Appl., V2, P10