Cytosolic concentrations of actin binding proteins and the implications for in vivo F-actin turnover

被引:5
|
作者
Rodriguez, Sofia Gonzalez [1 ]
Wirshing, Alison C. E. [1 ]
Goodman, Anya L. [1 ,2 ]
Goode, Bruce L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Rosenstiel Basic Med Sci Res Ctr, Dept Biol, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ SLO, Dept Chem & Biochem, San Luis Obispo, CA USA
关键词
YEAST ACTIN; TROPOMYOSIN BINDING; CELLULAR FUNCTION; DYNAMICS; COFILIN; CYTOSKELETON; MECHANISM; CABLES; ENDOCYTOSIS; SRV2/CAP;
D O I
10.1083/jcb.202306036
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Understanding how numerous actin-binding proteins (ABPs) work in concert to control the assembly, organization, and turnover of the actin cytoskeleton requires quantitative information about the levels of each component. Here, we measured the cellular concentrations of actin and the majority of the conserved ABPs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as well as the free (cytosolic) fractions of each ABP. The cellular concentration of actin is estimated to be 13.2 mu M, with approximately two-thirds in the F-actin form and one-third in the G-actin form. Cellular concentrations of ABPs range from 12.4 to 0.85 mu M (Tpm1> Pfy1> Cof1> Abp1> Srv2> Abp140> Tpm2> Aip1> Cap1/2> Crn1> Sac6> Twf1> Arp2/3> Scp1). The cytosolic fractions of all ABPs are unexpectedly high (0.6-0.9) and remain so throughout the cell cycle. Based on these numbers, we speculate that F-actin binding sites are limited in vivo, which leads to high cytosolic levels of ABPs, and in turn helps drive the rapid assembly and turnover of cellular F-actin structures.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CaMKIIβ binding to stable F-actin in vivo regulates F-actin filament stability
    Lin, Yu-Chih
    Redmond, Lori
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (41) : 15791 - 15796
  • [2] Control of nuclear organization by F-actin binding proteins
    Pfisterer, Karin
    Jayo, Asier
    Parsons, Maddy
    NUCLEUS, 2017, 8 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [3] Cofilin drives rapid turnover and fluidization of entangled F-actin
    McCall, Patrick M.
    MacKintosh, Frederick C.
    Kovar, David R.
    Gardel, Margaret L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (26) : 12629 - 12637
  • [4] Affimer proteins for F-actin: novel affinity reagents that label F-actin in live and fixed cells
    Lopata, Anna
    Hughes, Ruth
    Tiede, Christian
    Heissler, Sarah M.
    Sellers, James R.
    Knight, Peter J.
    Tomlinson, Darren
    Peckham, Michelle
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [5] Effects of Binding Factors on Structural Elements in F-Actin
    Scoville, Damon
    Stamm, John D.
    Altenbach, Christian
    Shvetsov, Alexander
    Kokabi, Kaveh
    Rubenstein, Peter A.
    Hubbell, Wayne L.
    Reisler, Emil
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 48 (02) : 370 - 378
  • [6] F-actin binding is essential for coronin 1B function in vivo
    Cai, Liang
    Makhov, Alexander M.
    Bear, James E.
    JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2007, 120 (10) : 1779 - 1790
  • [7] Characteristics of the binding features of Nelin with F-actin and screening Nelin interactive proteins
    Wang, Z
    Meng, XM
    Cao, HQ
    Liu, DQ
    Feng, Y
    You, X
    Wang, Y
    Guo, LJ
    Qu, S
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2004, 49 (23): : 2487 - 2490
  • [8] Characteristics of the binding features of Nelin with F-actin and screening Nelin interactive proteins
    WANG Zhen1
    2. Department of Molecular Biology
    3. School of Basic Medical Sciences
    4. Department of Inspection
    Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, (23) : 2487 - 2490
  • [9] hhLIM is a novel F-actin binding protein involved in actin cytoskeleton remodeling
    Zheng, Bin
    Wen, Jin-kun
    Han, Mei
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2008, 275 (07) : 1568 - 1578
  • [10] The effect of two actin depolymerizing factors (ADF/cofilins) on actin filament turnover:: pH sensitivity of F-actin binding by human ADF, but not of Acanthamoeba actophorin
    Maciver, SK
    Pope, BJ
    Whytock, S
    Weeds, AG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 256 (02): : 388 - 397