Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Can they be observed?

被引:1
|
作者
Kramer, Sarah P. [1 ,2 ]
Tonelli, Celsa [3 ]
Abdelsattar, Zaid [4 ]
Cohn, Tyler [3 ,5 ]
Luchette, Fred A. [3 ,5 ]
Baker, Marshall S. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Maywood, IL USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[4] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[5] Edward Hines Jr Dept Vet Affairs Hosp, Dept Surg, Hines, IL USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, 50 North Med Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.037
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies comparing approaches to managing rectal neuroendocrine tumors are underpowered by institutional series. The efficacy of expectant management relative to local excision and radical resection is poorly defined.Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients presenting with non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumors between 2004 and 2019. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with expectant management. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing expectant management were 1:1:1 propensity score matched for demographics and comorbid disease to those undergoing radical resection and local excision. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival profiles for matched cohorts.Results: A total of 6,316 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 5,211 (83%) underwent local excision, 600 (9.5%) radical resection, and 505 (8%) expectant management. On multivariable regression, factors associated with expectant management included Black race, government insurance, and tumor size <2.0 centimeters. On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality included age >65 years, male sex, government insurance, comorbidity score >0, tumor size >2 centimeters, and poorly differentiated histology. On comparison of matched cohorts: patients undergoing radical resection had longer hospitalizations and higher readmission rates than those undergoing local excision; there was no difference in overall survival between cohorts in patients with stage 1 disease; in stage 2 and 3 diseases, patients undergoing local excision and radical resection demonstrated improved rates of overall survival relative to those undergoing expectant management.Conclusion: Expectant management is a reasonable approach for patients with stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Local excision should be the preferred treatment option for those presenting with stage 2/3 disease.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1161 / 1167
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Can we predict their behavior?
    Dell'Unto, Elisabetta
    Panzuto, Francesco
    Esposito, Gianluca
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 31 (05)
  • [2] Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: surgical therapy
    Radulova-Mauersberger, O.
    Stelzner, S.
    Witzigmannn, H.
    CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (04): : 292 - 297
  • [3] Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: endoscopic therapy
    Eick, J.
    Steinberg, J.
    Schwertner, C.
    Ring, W.
    Scheruebl, H.
    CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (04): : 288 - 291
  • [4] Comparison of characteristics between true rectal neuroendocrine tumors and rectal hyperplastic polyps among patients with endoscope-diagnosed rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Weng, Yan
    Ran, Jingxue
    Peng, Yongmei
    Xiang, Yining
    Xu, Liangbi
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (03) : 1121 - 1131
  • [5] Clinical and Prognostic Features of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Weinstock, Brett
    Ward, Stephen C.
    Harpaz, Noam
    Warner, Richard R. P.
    Itzkowitz, Steven
    Kim, Michelle Kang
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 98 (03) : 180 - 187
  • [6] Clinical impact of atypical endoscopic features in rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Hyun, Jong Hee
    Lee, Seong Dae
    Youk, Eui Gon
    Lee, Jae Bum
    Lee, Enu-Jung
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (47) : 13302 - 13308
  • [7] Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Park, Su Bum
    Kim, Hyung Wook
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Choi, Cheol Woong
    Kim, Su Jin
    Nam, Hyeong Seok
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (31) : 9387 - 9393
  • [8] Outcome of Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤ 10 mm
    Rossi, Roberta Elisa
    Terrin, Maria
    Carrara, Silvia
    Maselli, Roberta
    Bertuzzi, Alexia Francesca
    Uccella, Silvia
    Lania, Andrea Gerardo Antonio
    Zerbi, Alessandro
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (14)
  • [9] Risk Factor Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Who Needs a Radical Resection in Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Sized 1-2 cm?
    Choi, Jin Sun
    Kim, Min Jung
    Shin, Rumi
    Park, Ji Won
    Heo, Seung Chul
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    Ryoo, Seung-Bum
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 2414 - 2424
  • [10] Surveillance Strategy for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors According to Recurrence Risk Stratification
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lee, Jin Ha
    Cha, Yoon Jin
    Park, Soo Jung
    Cheon, Jae Hee
    Kim, Tae Il
    Kim, Hoguen
    Kim, Won Ho
    Hong, Sung Pil
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (04) : 850 - 856