Natural language processing for mental health interventions: a systematic review and research framework

被引:30
作者
Malgaroli, Matteo [1 ]
Hull, Thomas D. [2 ]
Zech, James M. [2 ,3 ]
Althoff, Tim [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Talkspace, New York, NY 10025 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Comp Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
COMPUTERIZED TEXT ANALYSIS; TOPIC MODELS; THERAPY; ANXIETY; CARE; DEPRESSION; EMOTION; ACCESS; COUNTRIES; ALLIANCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41398-023-02592-2
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Neuropsychiatric disorders pose a high societal cost, but their treatment is hindered by lack of objective outcomes and fidelity metrics. AI technologies and specifically Natural Language Processing (NLP) have emerged as tools to study mental health interventions (MHI) at the level of their constituent conversations. However, NLP's potential to address clinical and research challenges remains unclear. We therefore conducted a pre-registered systematic review of NLP-MHI studies using PRISMA guidelines (osf.io/s52jh) to evaluate their models, clinical applications, and to identify biases and gaps. Candidate studies (n = 19,756), including peer-reviewed AI conference manuscripts, were collected up to January 2023 through PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ArXiv. A total of 102 articles were included to investigate their computational characteristics (NLP algorithms, audio features, machine learning pipelines, outcome metrics), clinical characteristics (clinical ground truths, study samples, clinical focus), and limitations. Results indicate a rapid growth of NLP MHI studies since 2019, characterized by increased sample sizes and use of large language models. Digital health platforms were the largest providers of MHI data. Ground truth for supervised learning models was based on clinician ratings (n = 31), patient self-report (n = 29) and annotations by raters (n = 26). Text-based features contributed more to model accuracy than audio markers. Patients' clinical presentation (n = 34), response to intervention (n = 11), intervention monitoring (n = 20), providers' characteristics (n = 12), relational dynamics (n = 14), and data preparation (n = 4) were commonly investigated clinical categories. Limitations of reviewed studies included lack of linguistic diversity, limited reproducibility, and population bias. A research framework is developed and validated (NLPxMHI) to assist computational and clinical researchers in addressing the remaining gaps in applying NLP to MHI, with the goal of improving clinical utility, data access, and fairness.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 168 条
  • [1] A scoping review of machine learning in psychotherapy research
    Aafjes-van Doorn, Katie
    Kamsteeg, Celine
    Bate, Jordan
    Aafjes, Marc
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2021, 31 (01) : 92 - 116
  • [2] Progressive changes in descriptive discourse in First Episode Schizophrenia: a longitudinal computational semantics study
    Alonso-Sanchez, Maria Francisca
    Ford, Sabrina D.
    MacKinley, Michael
    Silva, Angelica
    Limongi, Roberto
    Palaniyappan, Lena
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [3] Alonso-Sanchez MF., 2022, Schizophrenia Res, V259, P97
  • [4] Alsentzer E., 2019, Proceedings of the 2nd clinical natural language processing workshop, V2019, P72, DOI DOI 10.18653/V1/W19-1909
  • [5] Althoff Tim, 2016, Trans Assoc Comput Linguist, V4, P463
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V8, pE1352, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30432-0
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, PROC WORKSHOP COMPUT, DOI DOI 10.3115/V1/W14-3202
  • [8] Clinical state tracking in serious mental illness through computational analysis of speech
    Arevian, Armen C.
    Bone, Daniel
    Malandrakis, Nikolaos
    Martinez, Victor R.
    Wells, Kenneth B.
    Miklowitz, David J.
    Narayanan, Shrikanth
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [9] Association A.P., 2006, American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders: compendium 2006
  • [10] Multimodal Analysis of Client Behavioral Change Coding in Motivational Interviewing
    Aswamenakul, Chanuwas
    Liu, Lixing
    Carey, Kate B.
    Woolley, Joshua
    Scherer, Stefan
    Borsari, Brian
    [J]. ICMI'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION, 2018, : 356 - 360