Quantifying the dynamical interactions between carbon pricing and environmental protection tax in China

被引:13
|
作者
Hu, Xiurong [1 ]
Wu, Huihuang [2 ]
Ni, Wenli [1 ]
Wang, Qunwei [1 ]
Zhou, Dequn [1 ]
Liu, Junfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Carbon tax; Computable general equilibrium modeling; Co-benefits; TARGETS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106912
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China's environmental protection tax (EPT) has been in effect since the beginning of 2018 to combat the country's severe air pollution problems. Meanwhile, carbon tax (CTX) has been identified as the most effective way of climate change mitigation. The combined effects of these two policies, in conjunction to their dynamical interactions, however, have yet been thoroughly studied. Utilizing a multiple-province computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, we compare the effects of EPT and CTX policies solely and jointly in 2030. The results show that the EPT policy has limited impact on energy-related air pollution and CO2 reduction, while the CTX policy effectively targets CO2 emissions from energy combustion processes and provides significant co-benefits in reducing air pollutants. The integration of these two policies enhances emission reduction efficiency, with the CTX policy complementing the EPT policy. Implementing CTX alongside EPT leads to substantial emissions reductions, particularly in high-industrial provinces. However, there are economic implications, as certain provinces may experience GDP losses, emphasizing the importance of equitable burden distribution. Policymakers should carefully evaluate and adjust carbon tax rates to ensure both effectiveness and fairness in achieving environmental goals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on carbon intensity in China
    Zhong S.
    Zhou Z.
    Jin D.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (20) : 29695 - 29718
  • [2] Environmental Protection Tax Law on the synergy of pollution reduction and carbon reduction in China: Evidence from a panel data of 107 cities
    Gao, Xinwei
    Liu, Na
    Hua, Yujie
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 33 : 425 - 437
  • [3] Environmental protection tax and corporate carbon emissions in China: a perspective of green innovation
    Wei, Rongrong
    Wang, Mengling
    Xia, Yueming
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024, 26 (08) : 2625 - 2641
  • [4] Price of going green: The employment effects of the environmental protection tax in China
    Lu, Shuling
    Yang, Qijing
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 87
  • [5] Carbon reduction triggered by shocks from environmental protection tax: evidence from China
    Dai, Sijia
    Lin, Hanjing
    Wang, Zhixuan
    Wang, Hanning
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025,
  • [6] Implementing environmental protection tax in China: an alternative framework
    Cai, Wei
    Bai, Min
    Davey, Howard
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 34 (03) : 479 - 513
  • [7] Can environmental protection tax drive manufacturing carbon unlocking? Empirical evidence from China
    Wen, Limin
    Sun, Shufang
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [8] Can PM 2.5 concentration reduced by China's environmental protection tax?
    Yang, Zhe
    Xiong, Zhenwu
    Wang, LiYun
    Xue, Wenhao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 937
  • [9] Research on the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Carbon Tax Pricing for the Sustainable Development Process of China
    Zhang, Jiahao
    Li, Chaolin
    Ji, Xiangnan
    Zhang, Li
    Chen, Yanjun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [10] Environmental protection tax and trade credit: Evidence from China
    Lu, Xueyao
    Cheng, Lin
    Niu, Yuhao
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2025, 25 (01)