Hybrid Machine Learning-Mathematical Programming Approach for Optimizing Gas Production and Water Management in Shale Gas Fields

被引:13
作者
Lopez-Flores, Francisco Javier [1 ]
Lira-Barragan, Luis Fernando [1 ]
Rubio-Castro, Eusiel [2 ]
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. [3 ]
Ponce-Ortega, Jose Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michoacana, Chem Engn Dept, Morelia 58060, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Sinaloa, Chem & Biol Sci Dept, Culiacan 80010, Sinaloa, Mexico
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Chem Engn Dept, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
machine learning; flowback water; shale gas production; hydraulic fracturing; artificial neural network; mixed-integer nonlinear programming; ESTIMATED ULTIMATE RECOVERY; WASTE-WATER; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; UNCERTAINTY; NETWORKS; DESIGN; BASIN; COST;
D O I
10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c00569
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper presents a novel mathematical program-ming approach that simultaneously incorporates a mixed-integer nonlinear programming formulation with machine learning models to determine the operating conditions, gas production, and optimal water management for the completion phase in shale gas fields. The dataset for the development of an artificial neural network model has been collected from the Eagle Ford Texas formation. The total cumulative gas production and flowback water generated in shale gas wells are selected as output variables. The mathematical optimization model considers machine learning models for each well, mass balances, treatment, storage, reuse, and disposal options as well as well location selection and associated costs and revenues from the sale of the shale gas produced. A case study has been used to illustrate the benefits of the proposed approach. The compromise solution offers a water consumption per produced energy of 6.71 L/GJ in addition to the fact that 27% of the total fracture water required can be obtained by reusing the flowback water with attractive economic indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:6043 / 6056
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   A Stochastic Optimization Approach to the Design of Shale Gas/Oil Wastewater Treatment Systems with Multiple Energy Sources under Uncertainty [J].
Al-Aboosi, Fadhil Y. ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
[2]   Shale gas monetization - A review of downstream processing to chemicals and fuels [J].
Al-Douri, Ahmad ;
Sengupta, Debalina ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 45 :436-455
[3]   Hyperparameter Optimization: Comparing Genetic Algorithm against Grid Search and Bayesian Optimization [J].
Alibrahim, Hussain ;
Ludwig, Simone A. .
2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, :1551-1559
[4]   Deep learning and knowledge-based methods for computer-aided molecular design-toward a unified approach: State-of-the-art and future directions [J].
Alshehri, Abdulelah S. ;
Gani, Rafiqul ;
You, Fengqi .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 141
[5]   Weighted Random Search for CNN Hyperparameter Optimization [J].
Andonie, R. ;
Florea, A. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2020, 15 (02)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, KerasTuner
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Frequently Asked Questions: How much does a person use in a year?
[9]   An Empirical Study on Generalizations of the ReLU Activation Function [J].
Banerjee, Chaity ;
Mukherjee, Tathagata ;
Pasiliao, Eduardo, Jr. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ANNUAL ACM SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE (ACMSE 2019), 2019, :164-167
[10]   Multiobjective Optimization Model for Minimizing Cost and Environmental Impact in Shale Gas Water and Wastewater Management [J].
Bartholomew, Timothy V. ;
Mauter, Meagan S. .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (07) :3728-3735