Policy incentives, government subsidies, and technological innovation in new energy vehicle enterprises: Evidence from China

被引:134
作者
Jiang, Zhangsheng [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Chenghao [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Business Adm MBA Sch, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Zheshang Res Inst, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
Policy incentive; Government subsidies; New energy vehicle enterprises; Technology innovation; PSM-DID; DEA window analysis; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113527
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As the first step toward establishing the development of new energy vehicles (NEVs) as a national strategic priority, China's New Energy Vehicle Pilot City (NEVPC) policy has far-reaching significance for helping to develop China's capabilities in NEV industry. The existing literature focuses on the city- and industry-level impacts of this policy but ignores the important role of individual enterprises as innovation agents. In addition, in assessing the policy's effects technological innovation for NEV enterprises is typically measured in terms of output quantity, with no emphasis on innovation efficiency. This study uses balanced panel data from 2006 to 2020 covering 196 listed Chinese NEV enterprises to examine the mechanism and impact of the NEVPC policy on technological innovation within NEV enterprises. We show that the policy has achieved the goal of expanding government subsidies and had a significantly positive impact on the number of technological innovations produced by these enterprises, via a partial mediation effect. However, neither the policy nor the mechanism of government subsidies is effective in improving the efficiency of technological innovations for NEV enterprises. These results have important implications for formulating and improving policies for the NEV industry.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms? [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Lee, Weonvin ;
Mortara, Letizia .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
[2]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[3]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[4]   Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation [J].
Borusyak, Kirill ;
Jaravel, Xavier ;
Spiess, Jann .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2024, 91 (06) :3253-3285
[5]   Difference-in-differences when the treatment status is observed in only one period [J].
Botosaru, Irene ;
Gutierrez, Federico H. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 33 (01) :73-90
[6]   The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Piselli, Paolo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :442-457
[7]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[8]  
Charnes A., 1985, ANN OPER RES, V2, P59, DOI [10.1007/BF01874733, DOI 10.1007/BF01874733]
[9]   Repairing the R & D market failure: Public R & D subsidy and the composition of private R & D [J].
Choi, Joonhwan ;
Lee, Jaegul .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (08) :1465-1478
[10]   Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects [J].
De Chaisemartin, Clement ;
D'Haultfoeuille, Xavier .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 110 (09) :2964-2996