Effect of knee bracing on clinical outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomised controlled study

被引:0
作者
Gunadham, Ukris [1 ]
Woratanarat, Patarawan [2 ]
机构
[1] Trang Reg Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Trang 92000, Thailand
[2] Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
来源
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE ARTHROSCOPY REHABILITATION AND TECHNOLOGY | 2024年 / 36卷
关键词
ACL reconstruction; Functional outcome; Knee brace; Meniscus repair; Rehabilitation; REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; INJURIES; VALIDITY; TEARS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.asmart.2024.01.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: While there is a consensus against bracing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the question of its potential benefits, especially in cases involving meniscus repair, as well as its routine use by the majority of clinicians, remains a topic of debate. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of bracing in relation to clinical scores after ACL reconstruction, regardless of meniscus surgery. Methods: This randomised controlled study involved patients aged 15-55 years who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction surgery. All eligible patients were assigned into two groups: one group received an adjustable frame with a four-point fixation knee brace for a four-week period, while the other did not. A single experienced surgeon performed standard anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. All patients, irrespective of whether they underwent meniscus repair, followed the same rehabilitation protocol. Knee functional questionnaires, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and examinations, were collected preoperatively, at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. The study employed an intention-to-treat analysis and multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear models to compare continuous outcomes between the groups, adjusting for the times of follow-up. Results: A total of 84 patients (42 patients per group) comprised of 75 males (89 %) and average age of 30 +/- 9.4 years old. Patient-reported function, physical examination findings, and surgical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. (P-value >0.05) Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in IKDC and Lysholm scores at the end of the two-year follow-up period. (P-value <0.0001) In multivariate analysis, bracing was significantly associated with lower Tegner activity scale than the non-brace group after adjustment for VAS and time (coefficient -0.49, 95 % confidence interval -0.87, -0.10, P-value = 0.013). None of the graft ruptures were reported, and there was no significant difference of return to sports between the groups at the end of the follow-up. Conclusion: The study suggests that knee bracing after ACL reconstruction, regardless of any additional meniscus procedures, fails to enhance subjective or objective outcomes and could potentially have a negative impact on the Tegner activity scale, although the difference is not clinically significant. The routine use of a postoperative brace should be discontinued. Level of evidence: Level I, Randomised controlled trial with no negative criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee [J].
Briggs, Karen K. ;
Lysholm, Jack ;
Tegner, Yelverton ;
Rodkey, William G. ;
Kocher, Mininder S. ;
Steadman, J. Richard .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (05) :890-897
[2]   Variables Associated with Chondral and Meniscal Injuries in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery [J].
Cain, E. Lyle, Jr. ;
Fleisig, Glenn S. ;
Ponce, Brent A. ;
Boohaker, Hikel A. ;
George, Martha P. ;
McGwin, Gerald, Jr. ;
Andrews, James R. ;
Lemak, Lawrence J. ;
Clancy, William G., Jr. ;
Dugas, Jeffrey R. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (07) :659-667
[3]   Trends in Health Care Expenditures and Patient Out-of-Pocket Expenses in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [J].
Carbone, Andrew D. ;
Wang, Kevin ;
Tiao, Justin ;
Chu, Brennan ;
Poeran, Jashvant ;
Colvin, Alexis C. ;
Gladstone, James N. ;
Anthony, Shawn G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (10) :2680-2687
[4]  
Cavanaugh JT, 2012, CURR REV MUSCULOSKE, V5, P46, DOI 10.1007/s12178-011-9110-y
[5]   Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review [J].
Celik, Derya ;
Coban, Ozge ;
Kilicoglu, Onder .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 113 :44-57
[6]   Effects of the Off-Loading Brace on the Activation of Femoral Muscles - A Preliminary Study- [J].
Choi, Eun-Hi ;
Kim, Keon-Koo ;
Jun, Ah-Young ;
Choi, Eun-Hye ;
Choi, Sung-Won ;
Shin, Ka-Young .
ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2011, 35 (06) :887-896
[7]  
Copay AG, 2018, JBJS REV, V6, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00160
[8]   Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries: a best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews for the OPTIKNEE consensus [J].
Culvenor, Adam G. ;
Girdwood, Michael A. ;
Juhl, Carsten B. ;
Patterson, Brooke E. ;
Haberfield, Melissa J. ;
Holm, Paetur M. ;
Bricca, Alessio ;
Whittaker, Jackie L. ;
Roos, Ewa M. ;
Crossley, Kay M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (24) :1445-1453
[9]  
Deviandri Romy, 2022, Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, V14, P479, DOI 10.2147/CEOR.S368840
[10]  
Di Miceli Riccardo, 2017, Joints, V5, P202, DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1606617