Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel hinotoriTM surgical robot system: initial experience and operation learning curve at a single institution

被引:8
作者
Nakayama, Akinori [1 ,2 ]
Izumi, Keita [1 ]
Ikezoe, Erika [1 ]
Inoue, Minoru [1 ]
Tsujioka, Hiroki [1 ]
Nirazuka, Asumi [1 ]
Hasegawa, Kintaro [1 ]
Osaka, Akiyoshi [1 ]
Yasuda, Yuka [1 ]
Fukuda, Yuichi [1 ]
Inoue, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Iwahata, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Setoguchi, Kiyoshi [1 ]
Saito, Kazutaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Koshigaya, Japan
[2] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Urol, Saitama Med Ctr, 2-1-50 Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya 3438555, Japan
关键词
hinotori( TM) surgical robot system (HSRS); robot -assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP); learning curve; CANCER;
D O I
10.21037/tcr-23-1025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The hinotori (TM) surgical robot system (HSRS) is the first made-in-Japan robotic system used for radical prostatectomy. Here, we report initial results and describe our learning curve (skill development) implementing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using HSRS (h-RARP). Methods: Between November 2021 and December 2022, 97 patients who underwent h-RARP at our institution were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical outcomes of the initial cases using h-RARP, comparing those of RARP using da Vinci surgical robot system (d-RARP) in our institution. Furthermore, the learning curves of two surgeons with the highest number of h-RARP were analyzed. Patients treated by each surgeon were categorized into two groups: 1-15 cases (earlier group) and >15 cases (later group). Preoperative patient characteristics, operation parameters, and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results: In terms of surgical outcome, h-RARP was comparable to d-RARP. The procedures performed by the HSRS were successfully completed in all cases. There was no complication of grade 3 or higher. Comparing the two surgeons, surgeon 1, who had performed 40 d-RARP procedures, had time using robot system of the later group that was significantly shorter than that of the earlier group. However, for surgeon 2 with more than 100 d-RARP procedures, there was no statistically significant difference in time using robot system between groups. Other parameters showed no difference between earlier and later groups for the two surgeons. Conclusions: Our results show that surgical outcomes of h-RARP are comparable to those of d-RARP during the initial experience of clinical application. In addition, the surgeons' learning curves for the total RARP experience suggest that the experience of d-RARP can carry over to performance using the novel HSRS.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Predictors of trainees' proficiency during the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at high--volume institutions: results from a multicentric series
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Morelli, Michele
    Flammia, Rocco Simone
    Brassetti, Aldo
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Galfano, Antonio
    Tappero, Stefano
    Vecchio, Enrico
    Martiriggiano, Marco
    Luciani, Lorenzo Giuseppe
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Albisinni, Simone
    Tuderti, Gabriele
    Prata, Francesco
    Ferriero, Maria Consiglia
    Bove, Alfredo Maria
    Mastroianni, Riccardo
    Spadaro, Giuseppe
    Russo, Andrea
    Mattevi, Daniele
    Tufano, Antonio
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Cai, Tommaso
    Quackels, Thierry
    Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo
    Simone, Giuseppe
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 76 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [2] Analysis of predictors of early trifecta achievement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for trainers and expert surgeons: the learning curve never ends
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Galfano, Antonio
    Luciani, Lorenzo
    Misuraca, Leonardo
    Albisinni, Simone
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Tuderti, Gabriele
    Brassetti, Aldo
    Ferriero, Maria C.
    Bove, Alfredo M.
    Mastroianni, Riccardo
    Petralia, Giovanni
    Secco, Silvia
    Di Trapani, Ettore
    Mattevi, Daniele
    Puglisi, Marco
    Cai, Tommaso
    Quackels, Thierry
    Malossini, Gianni
    Bocciardi, Aldo M.
    Simone, Giuseppe
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 74 (02): : 133 - 136
  • [3] Effectiveness of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in the survival of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andres Garcia-Perdomo, Herney
    Jaime Correa-Ochoa, Jose
    Contreras-Garcia, Ricardo
    Daneshmand, Siamak
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 71 (03) : 262 - 269
  • [4] Prostate Cancer - Major Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Sartor, Oliver
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (03) : 246 - 253
  • [5] The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience
    Clavien, Pierre A.
    Barkun, Jeffrey
    de Oliveira, Michelle L.
    Vauthey, Jean Nicolas
    Dindo, Daniel
    Schulick, Richard D.
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Pekolj, Juan
    Slankamenac, Ksenija
    Bassi, Claudio
    Graf, Rolf
    Vonlanthen, Rene
    Padbury, Robert
    Cameron, John L.
    Makuuchi, Masatoshi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) : 187 - 196
  • [6] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [7] 30 Years of Robotic Surgery
    Ghezzi, Tiago Leal
    Corleta, Oly Campos
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (10) : 2550 - 2557
  • [8] The Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Gumus, Eyup
    Boylu, Ugur
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (10) : 1633 - 1637
  • [9] Learning Curve and Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in 200 Initial Japanese Cases by a Single Surgeon
    Hashimoto, Takeshi
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    Gondo, Tatsuo
    Kamoda, Naohiro
    Satake, Naoya
    Ozu, Choichiro
    Horiguchi, Yutaka
    Namiki, Kazunori
    Nakashima, Jun
    Tachibana, Masaaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (10) : 1218 - 1223
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Krongrad A.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2000, 1 (1) : 36 - 40