Development of consensus quality indicators for cancer supportive care: a Delphi study and pilot testing

被引:1
作者
Hyatt, Amelia [1 ,2 ]
Gough, Karla [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chung, Holly [1 ]
Wood, Wendy [4 ]
Aston, Ruth [5 ]
Cockwill, Jo [6 ]
Galetakis, Spiridoula [7 ]
Krishnasamy, Meinir [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Nursing, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Australian Council Hlth Care Stand, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Assessment & Evaluat Res Ctr, Melbourne Grad Sch Educ, Melbourne, Australia
[6] VCCC Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
[7] Dept Hlth Victoria, Canc Support Treatment & Res Unit, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Cancer supportive care; Oncology; Quality indicators; indicator development; Delphi;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10876-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background High quality supportive care is fundamental to achieve optimal health outcomes for people affected by cancer. Use of quality indicators provides comparative information for monitoring, management, and improvement of care within and across healthcare systems. The aim of this Australian study was to develop and test a minimum viable set of cancer supportive care quality indicators that would be feasible to implement and generate usable data for policy and practice.Methods A two-round, modified reactive Delphi process was employed firstto develop the proposed indicators. Participants with expertise in cancer control in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada rated their level of agreement on a 7-point Likert scale against criteria assessing the importance, feasibility, and usability of proposed indicators. Relative response frequencies were assessed against pre-specified consensus criteria and a ranking exercise, which delivered the list of proposed indicators. Draft indicators were then presented to a purposive sample of clinicial and health management staff via qualitative interviews at two acute care settings in Melbourne, Australia for feedback regarding feasibility. Desktop audits of online published health service policy and practice descriptions were also conducted at participating acute care settings to confirm health service data availability and feasibility of collection to report against proposed indicators.Results Sixteen quality indicators associated with the delivery of quality cancer supportive care in Australian acute healthcare settings met pre-specified criteria for inclusion. Indicators deemed 'necessary' were mapped and ranked across five key categories: Screening, Referrals, Data Management, Communication and Training, and Culturally Safe and Accessible Care. Testing confirmed indicators were viewed as feasible by clinical and health management staff, and desktop audits could provide a fast and reasonably effective method to assess general adherence and performance.Conclusions The development of quality indicators specific to cancer supportive care provides a strong framework for measurement and monitoring, service improvement, and practice change with the potential to improve health outcomes for people affected by cancer. Evaluation of implementation feasibility of these expert consensus generated quality indicators is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review
    Juenger, Saskia
    Payne, Sheila A.
    Brine, Jenny
    Radbruch, Lukas
    Brearley, Sarah G.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (08) : 684 - 706
  • [22] Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research
    Keeney, S
    Hasson, F
    McKenna, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 53 (02) : 205 - 212
  • [23] Technique and rationale for branch-first total aortic arch repair
    Kim, Michelle
    Matalanis, George
    [J]. JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 4 : 1 - 4
  • [24] Refocusing cancer supportive care: a framework for integrated cancer care
    Krishnasamy, Meinir
    Hyatt, Amelia
    Chung, Holly
    Gough, Karla
    Fitch, Margaret
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [25] Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review
    Langendam, Miranda W.
    Piggott, Thomas
    Nothacker, Monika
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Armstrong, David
    Baldeh, Tejan
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Martins, Carolina Castro
    Darzi, Andrea
    Etxeandia, Itziar
    Florez, Ivan
    Hoving, Jan
    Karam, Samer G.
    Koetter, Thomas
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Muti-Schunemann, Giovanna E. U.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Follmann, Markus
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [26] Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Harris, Mark F.
    Russell, Grant
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2013, 12
  • [27] Process, structural, and outcome quality indicators of nutritional care in nursing homes: a systematic review
    Lorini, Chiara
    Porchia, Barbara Rita
    Pieralli, Francesca
    Bonaccorsi, Gugliemo
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [29] McGlynn EA, 2003, MED CARE, V41, pI39
  • [30] THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE - A WORTHWHILE RESEARCH APPROACH FOR NURSING
    MCKENNA, HP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 19 (06) : 1221 - 1225