Problem-solving support and instructional sequence: impact on cognitive load and student performance

被引:3
作者
Costley, Jamie [1 ]
Gorbunova, Anna [2 ]
Courtney, Matthew [3 ]
Chen, Ouhao [4 ]
Lange, Christopher [5 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Coll Educ, H1 Sheik Khalifa Bin Zayed St, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Inst Educ, Potapovskiy Pereulok 16-10, Moscow 101000, Russia
[3] Nazarbayev Univ, Grad Sch Educ, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave, Astana City 010000, Kazakhstan
[4] Loughborough Univ, Dept Math Educ, Schofield Bldg, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[5] Dankook Univ, Dept British & Amer Humanities, 152 Jukjeon Ro, Jukjeon 1 2 Dong, Yongin 16890, Gyeonggido, South Korea
关键词
Cognitive load; Direct instruction; Instructional sequence; Problem-solving; Worked examples; WORKED EXAMPLES;
D O I
10.1007/s10212-023-00757-7
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In terms of instructional sequencing and cognitive load research, it remains unclear what effect different instructional sequences have on cognitive load and how to use problem-solving support within instructional sequences to reduce cognitive load. The current study examines how instructional sequencing and problem-solving support interact with different types of cognitive load and learner performance. University students (n = 254) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: an explicit instruction first sequence, an unsupported problem-solving first sequence, and a supported problem-solving first sequence. Results show that intrinsic load did not differ across the three conditions, extraneous load was lowest in the explicit instruction first and supported problem-solving first conditions, germane load was highest in the supported problem-solving first condition, and performance was highest in the explicit instruction first condition. Providing insight into specific ways instructional sequencing and problem-solving support can reduce cognitive load; results suggest that either problem-solving activities need support or explicit instruction is needed before problem-solving.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1840
页数:24
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Assistance that fades in improves learning better than assistance that fades out [J].
Jennings, Jay ;
Muldner, Kasia .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (04) :371-394
[12]   Rethinking the Boundaries of Cognitive Load Theory in Complex Learning [J].
Kalyuga, Slava ;
Singh, Anne-Marie .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 28 (04) :831-852
[13]   Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching [J].
Kirschner, Paul A. ;
Sweller, John ;
Clark, Richard E. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (02) :75-86
[14]   From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory [J].
Kirschner, Paul A. ;
Sweller, John ;
Kirschner, Femke ;
Zambrano, Jimmy R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2018, 13 (02) :213-233
[15]   Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load [J].
Klepsch, Melina ;
Seufert, Tina .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (01) :45-77
[16]   Learning Problem-Solving Rules as Search Through a Hypothesis Space [J].
Lee, Hee Seung ;
Betts, Shawn ;
Anderson, John R. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2016, 40 (05) :1036-1079
[17]   Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load [J].
Leppink, Jimmie ;
Paas, Fred ;
van Gog, Tamara ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2014, 30 :32-42
[18]   Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load [J].
Leppink, Jimmie ;
Paas, Fred ;
Van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
Van Gog, Tamara ;
Van Merrinboer, Jeroen J. G. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 45 (04) :1058-1072
[19]   Problem-based learning as a facilitator of conceptual change [J].
Loyens, Sofie M. M. ;
Jones, Suzanne H. ;
Mikkers, Jeroen ;
van Gog, Tamara .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2015, 38 :34-42
[20]   Altering element interactivity and variability in example-practice sequences to enhance learning to write Chinese characters [J].
Lu, Jia ;
Kalyuga, Slava ;
Sweller, John .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) :837-843