Clinical and radiologic outcomes of Lima ProMade custom 3D-printed glenoid components in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: a minimum 2-year follow-up

被引:4
|
作者
Rashid, Mustafa S. [1 ]
Cunningham, Lindsay [1 ]
Shields, David W. [1 ]
Walton, Michael J. [1 ]
Monga, Puneet [1 ]
Bale, Richard S. [1 ]
Trail, Ian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wrightington Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Wigan, Lancs, England
关键词
Custom; 3D-printed; complex; shoulder; replacement; arthroplasty; revision; HEMIARTHROPLASTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.020
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing primary or revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using custom 3D-printed components to manage severe glenoid bone loss with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.Methods: Following ethical approval, patients were identified and invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were (1) severe glenoid bone loss necessitating the need for custom implants and (2) patients with definitive glenoid and humeral components implanted more than 2 years prior. Included patients underwent clinical assessment using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH). Radiographic assessment included anteroposterior and axial projections. Patients were invited to attend a computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm osseointegration. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation [SD]) and paired t test for parametric data.Results: Eleven patients declined to participate. Five patients were deceased prior to study commencement, leaving 42 remaining pa-tients in this analysis. Three patients had revision surgery before the 2-year follow-up; of these, 2 retained their custom glenoid com-ponents. Mean follow-up was 31.6 months from surgery (range 24-52 months). All 4 scores improved: OSS from a mean 15 (SD 8.4) to 36 (SD 12) (P < .001), Constant-Murley score from a mean 15 (SD 11.2) to 52 (SD 20.1) (P < .001), QuickDASH from a mean 70 (SD 21) to 31 (SD 24.8) (P = .004), and the ASES score from a mean 22 (SD 17.8) to 71 (SD 23.3) (P = .007). Radiologic evaluation demonstrated good osseointegration in all but 1 included patient.Conclusion: The utility of custom 3D-printed components for managing severe glenoid bone loss in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yields significant clinical improvements in this complex cohort. Large complex glenoid bone defects can be managed successfully with custom 3D-printed glenoid components.
引用
收藏
页码:2017 / 2026
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Clinical and radiographic outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing an inset glenoid component at 2-year minimum follow-up: a dual center study
    Johnston, Peter S.
    Strony, John T.
    Churchill, Jessica L.
    Kankaria, Roma
    Sears, Benjamin W.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    Gillespie, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (06) : 1222 - 1230
  • [2] The radiographic and clinical outcomes of stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up study
    Choi, Chang-Hyuk
    Choi, Ji Hoon
    Che, Sug Hun
    Kim, Jun-Young
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2024, 27 (04): : 428 - 436
  • [3] Stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiologic outcomes with minimum 2 years' follow-up
    Nabergoj, Marko
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    Authom, Thierry
    Beaudouin, Emmanuel
    Azar, Michel
    Wahab, Hassan
    Leger, Olivier
    Haight, Harrison
    Harris, Howard
    Collin, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (09) : e464 - e474
  • [4] Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up
    Zilber, Sebastien
    Camana, Eleonora
    Lapner, Peter
    Haritinian, Emil
    Josserand, Laurent Nove
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (09) : 2159 - 2164
  • [5] Total shoulder arthroplasty using an inlay mini-glenoid component for glenoid deficiency: a 2-year follow-up of 9 shoulders in 7 patients
    Davis, Daniel E.
    Acevedo, Daniel
    Williams, Alexis
    Williams, Gerald
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (08) : 1354 - 1361
  • [6] The use of an Ossis custom 3D-printed tri-flanged acetabular implant for major bone loss: minimum 2-year follow-up
    Kieser, David C.
    Ailabouni, Ramez
    Kieser, Sandra C. J.
    Wyatt, Michael C.
    Armour, Paul C.
    Coates, Mark H.
    Hooper, Gary J.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (06) : 668 - 674
  • [7] Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up
    Sebastien Zilber
    Eleonora Camana
    Peter Lapner
    Emil Haritinian
    Laurent Nove Josserand
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2159 - 2164
  • [8] Clinical and radiologic outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty using Arthrex Eclipse stemless humeral component with minimum 2 years' follow-up
    Gallacher, Sian
    Williams, Huw L. M.
    King, Andrew
    Kitson, Jeff
    Smith, Chris D.
    Thomas, William J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (12) : 2191 - 2197
  • [9] Clinical and radiologic outcomes of the second-generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid for total shoulder replacements after 2-6 years follow-up
    Panti, Juan Paulo
    Tan, Simon
    Kuo, Warren
    Fung, Sebastian
    Walker, Kim
    Duff, Jed
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2016, 136 (12) : 1637 - 1645
  • [10] Early experience with a 3-D printed porous surface, fixed-bearing, total ankle arthroplasty: A minimum of 2-year follow-up
    Duff, Joseph
    Dunson, Jordan
    Doty, Jesse F.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 30 (05) : 382 - 388