A comparative assessment of deep learning models for day-ahead load forecasting: Investigating key accuracy drivers

被引:7
作者
Pelekis, Sotiris [1 ]
Seisopoulos, Ioannis-Konstantinos [1 ]
Spiliotis, Evangelos [2 ]
Pountridis, Theodosios [1 ]
Karakolis, Evangelos [1 ]
Mouzakitis, Spiros [1 ]
Askounis, Dimitris [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Decis Support Syst Lab, Iroon Politech 9, Attica 15772, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Forecasting & Strategy Unit, Iroon Politech 9, Attica 15772, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Deep learning; Forecasting; Benchmarking; Energy demand; Ensemble; N-BEATS; NEURAL-NETWORK; DEMAND; ALGORITHM; CNN;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2023.101171
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Short-term load forecasting (STLF) is vital for the effective and economic operation of power grids and energy markets. However, the non-linearity and non-stationarity of electricity demand as well as its dependency on various external factors renders STLF a challenging task. To that end, several deep learning models have been proposed in the literature for STLF, reporting promising results. In order to evaluate the accuracy of said models in day-ahead forecasting settings, in this paper we focus on the national net aggregated STLF of Portugal and conduct a comparative study considering a set of indicative, well-established deep autoregressive models, namely multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), neural basis expansion coefficient analysis (N-BEATS), temporal convolutional networks (TCN), and temporal fusion transformers (TFT). Moreover, we identify factors that significantly affect the demand and investigate their impact on the accuracy of each model. Our results suggest that N-BEATS consistently outperforms the rest of the examined models. MLP follows, providing further evidence towards the use of feed-forward networks over relatively more sophisticated architectures. Finally, certain calendar and weather features like the hour of the day and the temperature are identified as key accuracy drivers, providing insights regarding the forecasting approach that should be used per case. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [31] Neural network ensemble operators for time series forecasting
    Kourentzes, Nikolaos
    Barrow, Devon K.
    Crone, Sven F.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (09) : 4235 - 4244
  • [32] Application of a fuzzy neural network combined with a chaos genetic algorithm and simulated annealing to short-term load forecasting
    Liao, Gwo-Ching
    Tsao, Ta-Peng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 10 (03) : 330 - 340
  • [33] Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting
    Lim, Bryan
    Arik, Sercan O.
    Loeff, Nicolas
    Pfister, Tomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2021, 37 (04) : 1748 - 1764
  • [34] A survey of transformers
    Lin, Tianyang
    Wang, Yuxin
    Liu, Xiangyang
    Qiu, Xipeng
    [J]. AI OPEN, 2022, 3 : 111 - 132
  • [35] Mishra Sanjib, 2008, 2008 1st International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET), P606, DOI 10.1109/ICETET.2008.94
  • [36] Moghaddas-Tafreshi S.M., 2008, P IEEE INT C IND TEC, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICIT.2008.4608590
  • [37] FFORMA: Feature-based forecast model averaging
    Montero-Manso, Pablo
    Athanasopoulos, George
    Hyndman, Rob J.
    Talagala, Thiyanga S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2020, 36 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [38] Toward explainable electrical load forecasting of buildings: A comparative study of tree-based ensemble methods with Shapley values
    Moon, Jihoon
    Rho, Seungmin
    Baik, Sung Wook
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 54
  • [39] Oreshkin BN, 2020, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1905.10437, 10.48550/arXiv.1905.10437, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1905.10437]
  • [40] Long-term load forecasting: models based on MARS, ANN and LR methods
    Nalcaci, Gamze
    Ozmen, Ayse
    Weber, Gerhard Wilhelm
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 27 (04) : 1033 - 1049