Addressing Uncertainty in Tool Wear Prediction with Dropout-Based Neural Network

被引:2
作者
Dey, Arup [1 ]
Yodo, Nita [2 ]
Yadav, Om P. [3 ]
Shanmugam, Ragavanantham [4 ]
Ramoni, Monsuru [1 ]
机构
[1] Navajo Tech Univ, Sch Engn Math & Technol, Crownpoint, NM 87313 USA
[2] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Fargo, ND 58102 USA
[3] North Carolina Agr & Tech State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Greensboro, NC 27411 USA
[4] Fairmont State Univ, Dept Engn Technol, Fairmont, WV 26554 USA
关键词
Monte Carlo dropout; uncertainty; tool wear; principal component analysis; interval prediction; LIFE PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/computers12090187
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Data-driven algorithms have been widely applied in predicting tool wear because of the high prediction performance of the algorithms, availability of data sets, and advancements in computing capabilities in recent years. Although most algorithms are supposed to generate outcomes with high precision and accuracy, this is not always true in practice. Uncertainty exists in distinct phases of applying data-driven algorithms due to noises and randomness in data, the presence of redundant and irrelevant features, and model assumptions. Uncertainty due to noise and missing data is known as data uncertainty. On the other hand, model assumptions and imperfection are reasons for model uncertainty. In this paper, both types of uncertainty are considered in the tool wear prediction. Empirical mode decomposition is applied to reduce uncertainty from raw data. Additionally, the Monte Carlo dropout technique is used in training a neural network algorithm to incorporate model uncertainty. The unique feature of the proposed method is that it estimates tool wear as an interval, and the interval range represents the degree of uncertainty. Different performance measurement matrices are used to compare the proposed method. It is shown that the proposed approach can predict tool wear with higher accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abu-Abed F.N., 2016, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, V11, P9636
[2]  
Altın C, 2016, European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, V5, P35, DOI [10.26417/ejis.v5i1.p35-44, 10.26417/ejis.v2i3-35-44, 10.26417/ejis.v2i3.p35-44, 10.26417/ejis.v2i3.35-44, DOI 10.26417/EJIS.V2I3.P35-44, 10.26417/ejis.v2i3.p35-44]
[3]   The assessment of cutting tool wear [J].
Astakhov, VP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2004, 44 (06) :637-647
[4]   An advanced numerical approach on tool wear simulation for tool and process design in metal cutting [J].
Binder, M. ;
Klocke, F. ;
Doebbeler, B. .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2017, 70 :65-82
[5]  
Blundell C, 2015, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1505.05424
[6]   SCIENCE AND STATISTICS [J].
BOX, GEP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 71 (356) :791-799
[7]   A hybrid information model based on long short-term memory network for tool condition monitoring [J].
Cai, Weili ;
Zhang, Wenjuan ;
Hu, Xiaofeng ;
Liu, Yingchao .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31 (06) :1497-1510
[8]  
Dargie W, 2009, P 2009 18 INT C COMP
[9]  
Dey Arup, 2022, International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, P107, DOI [10.1504/ijmms.2022.124921, 10.1504/IJMMS.2022.124921]
[10]   Conservative Confidence Interval Prediction in Fused Deposition Modeling Process With Linear Optimization Approach [J].
Dey, Arup ;
Yodo, Nita .
ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 8 (01)