Systemic antibiotics are not required for successful two-stage revision hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Petrie, M. J. [1 ]
Panchani, S. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Einzy, M. [1 ,3 ]
Partridge, D. [1 ]
Harrison, T. P. [1 ]
Stockley, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Wrightington Wigan & Leigh NHS Fdn Trust, Wigan, England
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; EXCHANGE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; STAGE REVISION; MANAGEMENT; BONE; LONG;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-0373
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Methods The study involved a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database from which we identified all patients who underwent an intended two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. All patients had a diagnosis of PJI according to the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013, a minimum five-year follow-up, and were assessed using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. The outcomes were grouped into 'successful' or 'unsuccessful'. Results A total of 299 two-stage revision THAs in 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 258 (86%) proceeded to second-stage surgery. Their mean age was 68.1 years (28 to 92). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 6.3 to 15.0). A 91% success rate was seen in those patients who underwent reimplantation, decreasing to 86% when including those who did not proceed to reimplantation. The median duration of postoperative systemic antibiotics following the first stage was five days (IQR 5 to 9). There was no significant difference in outcome between those patients who were treated with antibiotics for = 48 hours (p = 0.961) or = five days (p = 0.376) compared with those who were treated with longer courses. Greater success rates were seen for Gram-positive PJIs (87%) than for Gram-negative (84%) and mixed-oGram PJIs (72%; p = 0.098). Conclusion Aggressive surgical debridement with a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics at the time of first-stage revision surgery for PJI of the hip, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship, and reduced hospital costs.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Partial implant retention in two-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty
    Shi, Xiaojun
    Yang, Jing
    Zhou, Zongke
    Shen, Bin
    Kang, Pengde
    Pei, Fuxing
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (03) : 461 - 469
  • [42] Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection
    Pangaud, Corentin
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Argenson, Jean-Noel
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2019, 4 (08) : 495 - 502
  • [43] Two-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty for Primary Advanced Septic Arthritis of the Hip in Adults
    Li, Zhenzhong
    Wei, Congcong
    Li, Xiangke
    Yao, Mengxuan
    Li, Huijie
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [44] Comparison of two-stage revision arthroplasty and intramedullary arthrodesis in patients with failed infected knee arthroplasty
    Martin Gathen
    Matthias D. Wimmer
    Milena M. Ploeger
    Leonie Weinhold
    Matthias Schmid
    Dieter C. Wirtz
    Sascha Gravius
    Max J. Friedrich
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2018, 138 : 1443 - 1452
  • [45] Conservative two-stage revision with primary components of infected total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of survival, clinical and radiographic outcomes
    Burastero, Giorgio
    Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
    Cavagnaro, Luca
    Chiarlone, Francesco
    Carrega, Giuliana
    Capello, Andrea Giorgio
    Lovisolo, Stefano
    Felli, Lamberto
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [46] Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty in Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty
    Senel, Ahmet
    Ozturkmen, Yusuf
    Demirci, Ziya
    Telatar, Atakan
    Eren, Murat
    Sukur, Erhan
    Akman, Yunus Emre
    ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 24 (03): : 290 - 294
  • [47] Two-stage revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic hip infections with severe bone loss: Results from 182 cases
    Bialecki, Jerzy
    Kogut, Maciej
    Chaberek, Slawomir
    Bartosz, Pawel
    Obrebski, Marcin
    Marczynski, Wojciech
    Para, Marcin
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2020, 12 (02) : 71 - 75
  • [48] Total hip arthroplasty for destructive septic arthritis of the hip using a two-stage protocol without spacer placement
    Hipfl, Christian
    Karczewski, Daniel
    Oronowicz, Jakub
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Perka, Carsten
    Hardt, Sebastian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [49] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results
    Cavagnaro, Luca
    Chiarlone, Francesco
    Mosconi, Lorenzo
    Zanirato, Andrea
    Formica, Matteo
    Burastero, Giorgio
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (08) : 2031 - 2038
  • [50] Long Term Results of Two-Stage Revision for Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Multicenter Study
    Kildow, Beau J.
    Springer, Bryan D.
    Brown, Timothy S.
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    Garvin, Kevin L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)