Systemic antibiotics are not required for successful two-stage revision hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Petrie, M. J. [1 ]
Panchani, S. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Einzy, M. [1 ,3 ]
Partridge, D. [1 ]
Harrison, T. P. [1 ]
Stockley, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Wrightington Wigan & Leigh NHS Fdn Trust, Wigan, England
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; EXCHANGE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; STAGE REVISION; MANAGEMENT; BONE; LONG;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-0373
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Methods The study involved a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database from which we identified all patients who underwent an intended two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. All patients had a diagnosis of PJI according to the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013, a minimum five-year follow-up, and were assessed using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. The outcomes were grouped into 'successful' or 'unsuccessful'. Results A total of 299 two-stage revision THAs in 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 258 (86%) proceeded to second-stage surgery. Their mean age was 68.1 years (28 to 92). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 6.3 to 15.0). A 91% success rate was seen in those patients who underwent reimplantation, decreasing to 86% when including those who did not proceed to reimplantation. The median duration of postoperative systemic antibiotics following the first stage was five days (IQR 5 to 9). There was no significant difference in outcome between those patients who were treated with antibiotics for = 48 hours (p = 0.961) or = five days (p = 0.376) compared with those who were treated with longer courses. Greater success rates were seen for Gram-positive PJIs (87%) than for Gram-negative (84%) and mixed-oGram PJIs (72%; p = 0.098). Conclusion Aggressive surgical debridement with a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics at the time of first-stage revision surgery for PJI of the hip, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship, and reduced hospital costs.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: Mean Follow-Up of Ten Years
    Chen, Szu-Yuan
    Hu, Chi-Chien
    Chen, Chun-Chieh
    Chang, Yu-Han
    Hsieh, Pang-Hsin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [32] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Hipfl, Christian
    Leopold, Vincent
    Becker, Luis
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Perka, Carsten
    Hardt, Sebastian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 4481 - 4490
  • [33] The direct anterior approach: treating periprosthetic joint infection of the hip using two-stage revision arthroplasty
    Martin Thaler
    Ricarda Lechner
    Dietmar Dammerer
    Hermann Leitner
    Ismail Khosravi
    Michael Nogler
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 255 - 262
  • [34] Mechanical failure of articulating polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: the risk factors and the impact on interim function
    Yang, Fu-Shine
    Lu, Yu-Der
    Wu, Cheng-Ta
    Blevins, Kier
    Lee, Mel S.
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [35] Risk factors for failure of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip prosthesis: review of the literature and single centre cohort analysis
    Logroscino, G.
    Campana, V
    Pagano, S.
    Taccari, F.
    Fantoni, M.
    Saracco, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 23 : 65 - 75
  • [36] The efficacy of a drug holiday test on two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty
    Chang, Chun-Hung
    Tsai, Shang-Wen
    Hsu, Kuei-Hsiang
    Chang, Ming-Chau
    Chen, Wei-Ming
    Su, Yu-Ping
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 82 (06) : 500 - 504
  • [37] Two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee joint infections
    Alrayes, Majd M.
    Sukeik, Mohamed
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2023, 14 (03): : 113 - 122
  • [38] Intravenous drug abuse is a risk factor in the failure of two-stage treatment for infected total hip arthroplasty
    Su, Yu-Jie
    Lin, Sung-Yen
    Huang, Hsuan-Ti
    Chang, Je-Ken
    Chen, Chung-Hwan
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 33 (12) : 623 - 629
  • [39] Predictors of outcome following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty
    Rajgopal, Ashok
    Dahiya, Vivek
    Bhatnagar, Ayush
    Kumar, Sumit
    Aggarwal, Kalpana
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (12) : 5283 - 5291
  • [40] Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Goud, Annemarie L.
    Harlianto, Netanja, I
    Ezzafzafi, Solaiman
    Veltman, Ewout S.
    Bekkers, Joris E. J.
    Van der Wal, Bart C. H.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (02) : 829 - 838