Systemic antibiotics are not required for successful two-stage revision hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Petrie, M. J. [1 ]
Panchani, S. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Einzy, M. [1 ,3 ]
Partridge, D. [1 ]
Harrison, T. P. [1 ]
Stockley, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Wrightington Wigan & Leigh NHS Fdn Trust, Wigan, England
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; EXCHANGE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; STAGE REVISION; MANAGEMENT; BONE; LONG;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-0373
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Methods The study involved a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database from which we identified all patients who underwent an intended two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. All patients had a diagnosis of PJI according to the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013, a minimum five-year follow-up, and were assessed using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. The outcomes were grouped into 'successful' or 'unsuccessful'. Results A total of 299 two-stage revision THAs in 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 258 (86%) proceeded to second-stage surgery. Their mean age was 68.1 years (28 to 92). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 6.3 to 15.0). A 91% success rate was seen in those patients who underwent reimplantation, decreasing to 86% when including those who did not proceed to reimplantation. The median duration of postoperative systemic antibiotics following the first stage was five days (IQR 5 to 9). There was no significant difference in outcome between those patients who were treated with antibiotics for = 48 hours (p = 0.961) or = five days (p = 0.376) compared with those who were treated with longer courses. Greater success rates were seen for Gram-positive PJIs (87%) than for Gram-negative (84%) and mixed-oGram PJIs (72%; p = 0.098). Conclusion Aggressive surgical debridement with a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics at the time of first-stage revision surgery for PJI of the hip, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship, and reduced hospital costs.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty using a shortened post-operative course of antibiotics
    McKenna, Paul B.
    O'Shea, Keiran
    Masterson, Eric L.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2009, 129 (04) : 489 - 494
  • [2] Failure analysis of articulating polymethyl methacrylate spacers in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty
    Jaubert, M.
    Le Baron, M.
    Jacquet, C.
    Couvreur, A.
    Fabre-Aubrespy, M.
    Flecher, X.
    Ollivier, M.
    Argenson, J-N
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2022, 3 (06): : 485 - 494
  • [3] Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty
    Buchalter, Daniel B.
    Mahure, Siddharth A.
    Mollon, Brent
    Yu, Stephen
    Kwon, Young W.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (06) : 939 - 947
  • [4] The direct anterior approach: treating periprosthetic joint infection of the hip using two-stage revision arthroplasty
    Thaler, Martin
    Lechner, Ricarda
    Dammerer, Dietmar
    Leitner, Hermann
    Khosravi, Ismail
    Nogler, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (02) : 255 - 262
  • [5] Two-stage hip revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection without the use of spacer or cemented implants
    Gramlich, Yves
    Hagebusch, Paul
    Faul, Philipp
    Klug, Alexander
    Walter, Gerhard
    Hoffmann, Reinhard
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (11) : 2457 - 2466
  • [6] Complications of Resection Arthroplasty in Two-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection
    Sigmund, Irene K.
    Winkler, Tobias
    Oender, Nuri
    Perka, Carsten
    Renz, Nora
    Trampuz, Andrej
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [7] Two-Stage Cementless Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infected Primary Hip Arthroplasties
    Camurcu, Yalkin
    Sofu, Hakan
    Buyuk, Abdul Fettah
    Gursu, Sarper
    Kaygusuz, Mehmet Akif
    Sahin, Vedat
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (09) : 1597 - 1601
  • [8] Advantages of Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty
    Randelli, Filippo
    Aliprandi, Alberto
    Banci, Lorenzo
    Sconfienza, Luca
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    INFECTED IMPLANT, 2009, : 127 - +
  • [9] Experiences during Switching from Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Chronic Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection
    Navarro, Guillem
    Lozano, Luis
    Sastre, Sergi
    Bori, Rosa
    Bosch, Jordi
    Bori, Guillem
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (12):
  • [10] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty
    Straub, J.
    Staats, K.
    Vertesich, K.
    Kowalscheck, L.
    Windhager, R.
    Boehler, C.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (04) : 372 - 379