Prioritizing effective factors in training environmental concepts based on teaching models in higher education of Iran

被引:1
作者
Shirsavar, H. Rezghi [1 ]
Salami, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Educ management, GARMSAR Branch, Garmsar, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Educ Management, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Environmental concepts; Higher education; Teaching models; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-023-04859-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to prioritize effective factors in training environmental concepts based on teaching models in higher education of Iran. In this descriptive-survey study, opinions of 17 education experts were studied to prioritize effective factors in training environmental concepts in higher education of Iran. Moreover, 20 education experts who were professional in teaching models were studied to determine the best teaching model for teaching environmental concepts in a purposeful way in the academic year 2020-21. The assessment tools were a pairwise comparison questionnaire for the environmental concepts of higher education and a pairwise comparison questionnaire to select the best teaching model. The data of the first questionnaire related to the environmental factors of higher education were used by DEMATEL technique (Excel software), and Fuzzy TOPSIS method was used for the second questionnaire related to teaching models. In this study, according to experts of environmental concepts in Higher education, the factors of socio-cultural commitments about the environment, professors and political decisions affecting the environment were ranked as the first to third in terms of effectiveness, respectively. The evaluation of environmental knowledge, familiarity of higher education staff with the environment, and the structure of the organization were ranked as the first to third in terms of influential factors. Individual teaching models were estimated as the best one for successful teaching according to the factors of environmental concepts in higher education, and traditional teaching models were considered as the worst one.
引用
收藏
页码:5945 / 5956
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Abun D, 2017, TEXILA INT J ACAD RE, V4, P1, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.28802.32966, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.28802.32966]
  • [2] Ansari Rad P., 2020, ED SCHOLAST STUD, V9, P109
  • [3] Higher education and the sustainable development goals
    Chankseliani, Maia
    McCowan, Tristan
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 81 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [4] Integrating climate and food policies in higher education: a case study of the University of California
    Cleveland, David Arthur
    Jay, Jennifer Ayla
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2021, 21 (01) : 16 - 32
  • [5] Firoozfar I., 2020, Q J ENV ED SUSTAIN D, V9, P25, DOI [10.30473/ee.2020.7225, DOI 10.30473/EE.2020.7225]
  • [6] Ghasemi F., 2017, J ENV ED SUSTAIN DEV, V5, P53
  • [7] Joyce B, 2015, TEACHING PATTERNS
  • [8] Cross-country differences in the quality of schooling
    Kaarsen, Nicolai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 107 : 215 - 224
  • [9] Mohadesi H, 2012, MONTHLY NURSING MIDW, V2
  • [10] Mohammadi N., 2020, ENV SCI TECHNOL Q, V22, P391, DOI [10.22034/jest.2020.27922.3689, DOI 10.22034/JEST.2020.27922.3689]