Predicting psychosocial risk in pediatric kidney transplantation: An exploratory cluster analysis of a revised Pediatric Transplant Rating Instrument

被引:2
作者
West, Kara B. B. [1 ,3 ]
Plevinsky, Jill M. M. [1 ,2 ]
Amaral, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
Laskin, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Lefkowitz, Debra S. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, 3501 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
pretransplant evaluations; psychosocial risk clusters; targeted interventions; SOCIAL SUPPORT; NONADHERENCE; CHILDREN; ACCESS; CANDIDATES; RECIPIENTS; ADHERENCE; DIALYSIS; DISTRESS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/petr.14454
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: The Pediatric Transplant Rating Instrument (P-TRI) is a 17-item scale developed to assess psychosocial risk factors for poor outcomes after solid organ transplantation. Research has identified the limitations of the original instrument and proposed revisions to improve clinical utility. This project examined patterns of risk in children being evaluated for kidney transplant using a revised P-TRI. Methods: A multidisciplinary kidney transplant team revised the P-TRI. A social worker and a psychologist collaboratively completed the modified instrument for 37 children after the psychosocial pretransplant evaluation. Electronic medical records were reviewed for transplant status (transplanted, active waitlist, inactive) 1 year later. Exploratory cluster analyses and chi-square tests examined patterns of risk and correlates with cluster membership. Results: Three clusters were identified. The high-risk group (29.7%) had difficulties with medication and appointment adherence, strained relationships with the medical team, and the presence of parent psychiatric history. The medium-risk group (35.1%) had difficulties with parent knowledge, financial strain, and risk factors for medication nonadherence. The low-risk group (35.1%) demonstrated no difficulties with adherence or financial strain. Clusters were prospectively associated with transplant status, such that those in the high-risk group were less likely to be transplanted within 1 year post-evaluation. Conclusions: The revised P-TRI demonstrated good construct validity as risk level appeared to be associated with transplant listing status 1 year post-evaluation. These results suggest that standardized pretransplant psychosocial risk assessment tools may have value in optimizing transplant access if they can be paired with targeted, multidisciplinary interventions to address concerns early in the transplant process.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Disparities, race/ethnicity and access to pediatric kidney transplantation
    Amaral, Sandra
    Patzer, Rachel
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2013, 22 (03) : 336 - 343
  • [2] Waiting for transplant: Physical, psychosocial, and nutritional status considerations for pediatric candidates and implications for care
    Anthony, Samantha J.
    Annunziato, Rachel A.
    Fairey, Elise
    Kelly, Vicky L.
    So, Stephanie
    Wray, Jo
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 18 (05) : 423 - 434
  • [3] Ethical issues in access, listing and regulation of pediatric heart transplantation
    Bearl, David W.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2019, 8 (04) : 278 - 283
  • [4] Pre-liver transplant psychosocial evaluation predicts post-transplantation outcomes
    Benson, Ariel A.
    Rowe, Mina
    Eid, Ahmad
    Bluth, Keren
    Merhav, Hadar
    Khalaileh, Abed
    Safadi, Rifaat
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2018, 23 (07) : 788 - 796
  • [5] Effect of Pretransplant Dialysis Modality and Duration on Long-Term Outcomes of Children Receiving Renal Transplants
    Butani, Lavjay
    Perez, Richard V.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 91 (04) : 447 - 451
  • [6] Understanding disparities and barriers associated with pediatric transplant evaluation and time to listing: Moving toward a more comprehensive picture
    Christofferson, Elizabeth Steinberg
    Ruzicka, Elizabeth B.
    Bolt, Matthew
    Lyons, Emma
    Wachs, Michael
    Buchanan, Cindy L.
    Schmiege, Sarah J.
    Monnin, Kara
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 26 (02)
  • [7] A systematic review of parent and family functioning in pediatric solid organ transplant populations
    Cousino, Melissa K.
    Rea, Kelly E.
    Schumacher, Kurt R.
    Magee, John C.
    Fredericks, Emily M.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 21 (03)
  • [8] Factors That Influence Nonadherence in Immunosuppressant Treatment in Pediatric Transplant Recipients: A Proposal for an Educational Strategy
    Delucchi, A.
    Gutierrez, H.
    Arrellano, P.
    Slater, C.
    Meneses, M.
    Lopez, I.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (09) : 3241 - 3243
  • [9] Pretransplant Predictors of Posttransplant Adherence and Clinical Outcome: An Evidence Base for Pretransplant Psychosocial Screening
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Vanhaecke, Johan
    Dupont, Lieven
    Nevens, Frederik
    Verleden, Geert
    Pirenne, Jacques
    De Geest, Sabina
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (10) : 1497 - 1504
  • [10] Inter-rater reliability of the Pediatric Transplant Rating Instrument (P-TRI): Challenges to reliably identifying adherence risk factors during pediatric pre-transplant evaluations
    Fisher, M.
    Storfer-Isser, A.
    Shaw, R. J.
    Bernard, R. S.
    Drury, S.
    Ularntinon, S.
    Horwitz, S. M.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 15 (02) : 142 - 147