Functional magnetic resonance imaging activation for different vergence eye movement subtypes

被引:7
作者
Fogt, Nick [1 ]
Toole, Andrew J. [1 ]
Li, Xiangrui [2 ]
Owusu, Emmanuel [1 ]
Manning, Steven T. [1 ]
Kulp, Marjean T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, 338 West Tenth Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Cognit & Behav Brain Imaging, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
disparity; eye movement; functional MRI; proximal; vergence; voluntary; ACCOMMODATIVE VERGENCE; COMPONENT; CONVERGENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/opo.13063
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction Maddox suggested that there were four convergence subtypes, each driven by a different stimulus. The purpose of this study was to assess the neural correlates for accommodative convergence, proximal convergence (convergence stimulus provided), disparity convergence and voluntary convergence (no specific convergence stimulus provided) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods Ten subjects (mean age = 24.4 years) with normal binocular vision participated. The blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals of the brain from fMRI scans were measured when subjects made vergence eye movements while: (1) alternately viewing letters monocularly where one eye viewed through a -2.00 D lens, (2) alternately viewing Difference of Gaussian targets monocularly at distance and near, (3) viewing random dot stereograms with increasing disparity and (4) voluntarily converging the eyes with binocular viewing. Results The accommodative convergence paradigm resulted in activation on the right side in the right fusiform cortex and the right middle occipital cortex. The proximal convergence stimulus mainly activated areas in the right occipital lobe. The disparity stimulus activated areas in the left occipital cortex and the left frontal cortex. Finally, the voluntary convergence paradigm resulted in activation primarily in the occipital lobe and mostly bilaterally. Conclusion The accommodative, proximal, disparity and voluntary convergence paradigms resulted in activation in unique areas in the brain with functional MRI. Activation was found in more areas in the proximal and voluntary conditions compared with the accommodative and disparity conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Alkan Y, 2011, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P8114, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6092001
[2]   Differentiation between Vergence and Saccadic Functional Activity within the Human Frontal Eye Fields and Midbrain Revealed through fMRI [J].
Alkan, Yelda ;
Biswal, Bharat B. ;
Alvarez, Tara L. .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[3]   Segregation of frontoparietal and cerebellar components within saccade and vergence networks using hierarchical independent component analysis of fMRI [J].
Alkan, Yelda ;
Biswal, Bharat B. ;
Taylor, Paul A. ;
Alvarez, Tara L. .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 28 (03) :247-261
[4]   Functional activity within the frontal eye fields, posterior parietal cortex, and cerebellar vermis significantly correlates to symmetrical vergence peak velocity: an ROI-based, fMRI study of vergence training [J].
Alvarez, Tara L. ;
Jaswal, Raj ;
Gohel, Suril ;
Biswal, Bharat B. .
FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
[5]   Vision Therapy in Adults with Convergence Insufficiency: Clinical and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures [J].
Alvarez, Tara L. ;
Vicci, Vincent R. ;
Alkan, Yelda ;
Kim, Eun H. ;
Gohel, Suril ;
Barrett, Anna M. ;
Chiaravalloti, Nancy ;
Biswal, Bharat B. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2010, 87 (12) :985-1002
[6]   Functional anatomy of predictive vergence and saccade eye movements in humans: A functional MRI investigation [J].
Alvarez, Tara L. ;
Alkan, Yelda ;
Gohel, Suril ;
Ward, B. Douglas ;
Biswal, Bharat B. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (21) :2163-2175
[7]  
DAUM KM, 1988, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V65, P426
[8]  
Firth AY., 2005, BR IR ORTHOPT J, V2, P3
[9]  
Fogt Nick, 2020, Vis Dev Rehabil, V6, P252
[10]   A review of proximal inputs to the near response [J].
Fogt, Nick ;
Toole, Andrew J. ;
Rogers, David L. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2016, 99 (01) :30-38