Estimation and uncertainty analysis of groundwater quality parameters in a coastal aquifer under seawater intrusion: a comparative study of deep learning and classic machine learning methods

被引:18
|
作者
Tasan, Mehmet [1 ]
Tasan, Sevda [2 ]
Demir, Yusuf [2 ]
机构
[1] Black Sea Agr Res Inst, Dept Soil & Water Resources, TR-55300 Samsun, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Struct & Irrigat, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkey
关键词
Alacam; Coastal aquifer; Chloride; Groundwater salinization; Irrigation water quality; Machine learning algorithms; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-22375-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Excessive withdrawal of groundwater for agricultural irrigation can cause seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers. Such a case will in turn results in deterioration of irrigation water quality. Determination of irrigation water quality with traditional methods is a time-consuming and costly process. However, machine learning algorithms can be useful tools for modeling and estimating groundwater quality used for irrigation water purposes. In this study, TDS, PS, SAR, and Cl parameters of groundwater were estimated with models based on EC and pH variables. For this purpose, prediction performances of two different deep learning methods (convolutional neural network (CNN) and deep neural network (DNN)) and two different classical machine learning (Random Forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) methods were compared. In addition, predictive uncertainty of the models was determined by quantile regression (QR) analysis. Performance criteria and results of uncertainty analysis revealed that CNN (in testing phase, NSE= 0.95 for TDS, NSE = 0.96 for PS, NSE= 0.67 for SAR and NSE = 0.93 for CI) and DNN (in testing phase, NSE= 0.91 for TDS, NSE= 0.91 for PS, NSE= 0.57 for SAR and NSE = 0.94 for CI) models had quite a close performance in estimation of TDS, PS, SAR, and Cl parameters and higher than the other two classical machine learning methods. As a result, the CNN model can be considered the best performing model in estimating all quality parameters due to the highest NSE and lowest RMSE values. In addition, the Taylor diagram showed that the values estimated using the CNN model had the highest correlation with the measured data. It was determined that the model with the lowest uncertainty based on the PICP statistics was DNN, followed by the CNN model. However, the CNN model has predicted outliers more accurately. Present findings proved that deep learning models could offer efficient tools for predicting irrigation water quality parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:2866 / 2890
页数:25
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Estimation and uncertainty analysis of groundwater quality parameters in a coastal aquifer under seawater intrusion: a comparative study of deep learning and classic machine learning methods
    Mehmet Taşan
    Sevda Taşan
    Yusuf Demir
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 2866 - 2890
  • [2] Prediction of groundwater quality index in the Gaza coastal aquifer using supervised machine learning techniques
    Aish, Adnan M.
    Zaqoot, Hossam Adel
    Sethar, Waqar Ahmed
    Aish, Diana A.
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (03) : 501 - 521
  • [3] Comparative study for coastal aquifer vulnerability assessment using deep learning and metaheuristic algorithms
    Bordbar, Mojgan
    Heggy, Essam
    Jun, Changhyun
    Bateni, Sayed M.
    Kim, Dongkyun
    Moghaddam, Hamid Kardan
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (16) : 24235 - 24249
  • [4] Comparative analysis of deep and machine learning approaches for daily carbon monoxide pollutant concentration estimation
    Feizi, H.
    Sattari, M. T.
    Prasad, R.
    Apaydin, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (02) : 1753 - 1768
  • [5] Comparative Study of Principal Component Analysis Based Intrusion Detection Approach Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Chabathula, Krupa Joel
    Jaidhar, C. D.
    Kumara, Ajay M. A.
    2015 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING (ICSCN), 2015,
  • [6] Comparative analysis of kernel-based versus ANN and deep learning methods in monthly reference evapotranspiration estimation
    Sattari, Mohammad Taghi
    Apaydin, Halit
    Band, Shahab S.
    Mosavi, Amir
    Prasad, Ramendra
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (02) : 603 - 618
  • [7] A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for aboveground biomass estimation: A case study of the Western Ghats, India
    Ayushi, Kurian
    Babu, Kanda Naveen
    Ayyappan, Narayanan
    Nair, Jaishanker Raghunathan
    Kakkara, Athira
    Reddy, C. Sudhakar
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 80
  • [8] Uncertainty Assessment of Surface Water Salinity Using Standalone, Ensemble, and Deep Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of Lake Urmia
    Raheli, Bahareh
    Talabbeydokhti, Nasser
    Saadat, Solmaz
    Nourani, Vahid
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 48 (02) : 1029 - 1047
  • [9] A comparative study of individual and hybrid machine learning methods for estimation of vitrinite reflectance (Ro) from petrophysical well logs
    Safaei-Farouji, Majid
    Kadkhodaie, Ali
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (04) : 4867 - 4881
  • [10] ML-DPIE: comparative evaluation of machine learning methods for drought parameter index estimation: a case study of Türkiye
    Coban, Onder
    Esit, Musa
    Yalcin, Sercan
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (02) : 989 - 1021