Dependence structure learning and joint probabilistic forecasting of stochastic power grid variables

被引:2
作者
Stover, Oliver [1 ]
Nath, Paromita [2 ]
Karve, Pranav [1 ]
Mahadevan, Sankaran [1 ,3 ]
Baroud, Hiba [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Rowan Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Box 1831 Stn B, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
Power grid; Probabilistic forecasting; Multivariate forecast; Dependence structure; PROPER SCORING RULES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122438
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Stochastic optimization is a promising approach to support a reliable and cost-efficient transition to a renewable generation-dominated power grid. However, utilization of this approach requires accurate and computationally affordable probabilistic forecasts that rigorously quantify the uncertainty in and the correlation between stochastic grid variables (wind/solar generation and load demand). We investigate and compare two types of probabilistic forecasting model architectures for jointly predicting stochastic variables in a power grid: sequence-to-sequence models and recursive one step ahead prediction models. A long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network model is chosen to represent sequence-to-sequence deep learning models and a periodic vector autoregressive (PVAR) model is chosen to represent the one step ahead recursive models. For each model architecture, we consider three forecasting approaches: predicting each time series variable separately, jointly predicting all time series variables of a given type (e.g., wind generation or load), or jointly predicting all time series variables. We quantify the predictive capability of these forecasting models with respect to accuracy degradation with increasing prediction horizon, ability to characterize uncertainty, and ability to capture cross-variable dependence structure. We train and test the forecasting models using publicly available zonal power supply and demand time series data for the French power grid. We find that different modeling architectures/approaches show superior forecasting capability for different prediction horizons. Our results show that in general, one step-ahead recursive (PVAR) models have high prediction accuracy for short forecast horizons, and sequence-to-sequence (LSTM) models have slower performance degradation for longer forecast horizons.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Short-term electric load forecasting based on Kalman filtering algorithm with moving window weather and load model
    Al-Hamadi, HM
    Soliman, SA
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2004, 68 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [2] Albawi S, 2017, I C ENG TECHNOL
  • [3] Evaluating the discrimination ability of proper multi-variate scoring rules
    Alexander, C.
    Coulon, M.
    Han, Y.
    Meng, X.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 334 (1-3) : 857 - 883
  • [4] Load Forecasting Through Estimated Parametrized Based Fuzzy Inference System in Smart Grids
    Ali, Mansoor
    Adnan, Muhammad
    Tariq, Muhammad
    Poor, H. Vincent
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 29 (01) : 156 - 165
  • [5] Analysis of an adaptive time-series autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) model for short-term load forecasting
    Chen, JF
    Wang, WM
    Huang, CM
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (03) : 187 - 196
  • [6] Chen Y, 2014, 2014 IEEE PES GEN M, P1
  • [7] Period-aware content attention RNNs for time series forecasting with missing values
    Cinar, Yagmur Gizem
    Mirisaee, Hamid
    Goswami, Parantapa
    Gaussier, Eric
    Ait-Bachir, Ali
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2018, 312 : 177 - 186
  • [8] Economic and environmental implications of different approaches to hedge against wind production uncertainty in two-settlement electricity markets: A PJM case study
    Daraeepour, Ali
    Patino-Echeverri, Dalia
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 : 336 - 354
  • [9] Dey R, 2017, MIDWEST SYMP CIRCUIT, P1597, DOI 10.1109/MWSCAS.2017.8053243
  • [10] Francis M, 2021, Today in Energy